Re: Fwd: Auto: Your message 'FAIL IO-AIO-2.51 i386-freebsd-thread-multi 6.2-release' has NOT been received

2007-12-18 Thread chromatic
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 17:27:24 Andy Armstrong wrote: > Someone (MLEHMANN) doesn't like smoking... That was a test report > generated by CPAN::Reporter. > > It hadn't previously occurred to me that test reports might cause > offence... Didn't you get a whole slew of them a while back where t

Re: Fwd: Auto: Your message 'FAIL IO-AIO-2.51 i386-freebsd-thread-multi 6.2-release' has NOT been received

2007-12-18 Thread Michael G Schwern
chromatic wrote: > On Tuesday 18 December 2007 17:27:24 Andy Armstrong wrote: > >> Someone (MLEHMANN) doesn't like smoking... That was a test report >> generated by CPAN::Reporter. >> >> It hadn't previously occurred to me that test reports might cause >> offence... > > Didn't you get a whole sle

Re: Fwd: Auto: Your message 'FAIL IO-AIO-2.51 i386-freebsd-thread-multi 6.2-release' has NOT been received

2007-12-19 Thread Ovid
--- Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is particularly near to my heart as Test::More has a similiar > problem with thread tests and I'm not sure what to do about it. I've discovered that handing the problem to Andy Armstrong and batting my eyelashes works wonders. Cheers, Ovid -

Re: Fwd: Auto: Your message 'FAIL IO-AIO-2.51 i386-freebsd-thread-multi 6.2-release' has NOT been received

2007-12-24 Thread David Cantrell
Michael G Schwern wrote: > As for the social problem, the BSD testers could try to help out with whatever > the problem is. FWIW, I do, *if* the author gets in touch with me. It's not practical for me to try to help solve all the problems I find, but if an author cares enough to contact me, then