-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Wednesday 13 April 2005 22:52, Walter Goulet wrote:
> So the good news is that I was able to convince the author to let me
> include my dependancies in the test library. So I'll switch to
> Test::More.
>
> Thanks for the help.
Thats very good news!
Be
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 03:52:43PM -0500, Walter Goulet wrote:
> So the good news is that I was able to convince the author to let me
> include my dependancies in the test library. So I'll switch to
> Test::More.
Huzzah for sanity!
So the good news is that I was able to convince the author to let me
include my dependancies in the test library. So I'll switch to
Test::More.
Thanks for the help.
On 4/12/05, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 04:15:01PM -0500, Walter Goulet wrote:
> > I thin
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 04:15:01PM -0500, Walter Goulet wrote:
> I think the suggestion to use Test::Legacy was based on the statement
> 'backwards compatibility reasons' require me to use Test.pm. I should
> have been clearer in my explanation; the module author is not
> permitting me to use any a
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:57:02PM +0200, Tels wrote:
> > Try Test::Legacy, it gives you an upgrade path away from Test.pm.
> > http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Legacy/
> >
> > It almost perfectly emulates the Test.pm interface and it works in
> > conjunction with other test modules. If you're wor
I think the suggestion to use Test::Legacy was based on the statement
'backwards compatibility reasons' require me to use Test.pm. I should
have been clearer in my explanation; the module author is not
permitting me to use any additional modules that aren't included in
perl 5.6.0 to test his module
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 22:15, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 01:39:59PM -0500, Walter Goulet wrote:
> > I can't use Test::Simple, I have to use Test.pm for this module for
> > backwards compatibility reasons.
>
> Try Test::Legacy, it
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 01:39:59PM -0500, Walter Goulet wrote:
> I can't use Test::Simple, I have to use Test.pm for this module for
> backwards compatibility reasons.
Try Test::Legacy, it gives you an upgrade path away from Test.pm.
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Legacy/
It almost perfectly em
I can't use Test::Simple, I have to use Test.pm for this module for
backwards compatibility reasons.
I'm trying to replace this function call with an ok() call:
$ctx = Net::SSLeay::SSL_CTX_new() or die ("Unable to create SSL context");
Hard to tell what $ctx is if SSL_CTX_new() fails; I know it
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:49:30PM -0500, Walter Goulet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if there is a way to use the ok() function in Test.pm
> to check for a null return value. It looks like the 3 arg form of ok()
> I'm using only tests the first 2 args to see if they're equal.
>
> I'm consider
10 matches
Mail list logo
