Ovid wrote:
> Summary: if your TAP suddenly jumps from test #2 to test #29,
> Test::Harness reports that tests #3 through #28 have 'failed'.
>
> TAPx::Harness does not report them as failures, but as parse errors
> (because it's bad TAP). Is a 'parse error' a reasonable compromise?
Technicall
Summary: if your TAP suddenly jumps from test #2 to test #29,
Test::Harness reports that tests #3 through #28 have 'failed'.
TAPx::Harness does not report them as failures, but as parse errors
(because it's bad TAP). Is a 'parse error' a reasonable compromise?
More information below, if you'r
