Re: Public Humiliation and Kwalitee (was Re: Tested File-Find-Object-0.1.1 with Class::Accessor not installed)

2008-10-24 Thread rfisk
tt-Thoennes Cc: perl-qa@perl.org Sent: Oct 23, 2008 13:33 Subject: Re: Public Humiliation and Kwalitee (was Re: Tested File-Find-Object-0.1.1 with Class::Accessor not installed) On Thursday 23 October 2008 11:25:05 Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > On Thu, October 23, 2008 10:37 am, chr

Re: Public Humiliation and Kwalitee (was Re: Tested File-Find-Object-0.1.1 with Class::Accessor not installed)

2008-10-23 Thread Gabor Szabo
> http://cpants.perl.org/highscores/hall_of_shame It says "Not Found" thanks domm Gabor

Re: Public Humiliation and Kwalitee (was Re: Tested File-Find-Object-0.1.1 with Class::Accessor not installed)

2008-10-23 Thread chromatic
On Thursday 23 October 2008 11:25:05 Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > On Thu, October 23, 2008 10:37 am, chromatic wrote: > > I don't care about backchannel communication between other authors and > > CPAN Testers, but how can you blame Shlomi for thinking that public > > humiliation isn't a vital

Re: Public Humiliation and Kwalitee (was Re: Tested File-Find-Object-0.1.1 with Class::Accessor not installed)

2008-10-23 Thread Andy Lester
On Oct 23, 2008, at 1:25 PM, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: http://cpants.perl.org/highscores/hall_of_shame That looks sorted by kwalitee and author. If we're shaming people, author name shouldn't be a factor. Could it be by kwalitee and most recent release date instead? How about n

Public Humiliation and Kwalitee (was Re: Tested File-Find-Object-0.1.1 with Class::Accessor not installed)

2008-10-23 Thread chromatic
On Thursday 23 October 2008 06:34:41 Ovid wrote: > That being said, why are you trying to publicly humiliate people by sending > this information to Perl-QA? I've contacted Perl-QA to try and find a smoke > author before, but not to "name and shame". That just seems rude. I don't care about back

Re: Public Humiliation and Kwalitee (was Re: Tested File-Find-Object-0.1.1 with Class::Accessor not installed)

2008-10-23 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Thu, October 23, 2008 10:37 am, chromatic wrote: > I don't care about backchannel communication between other authors and > CPAN > Testers, but how can you blame Shlomi for thinking that public humiliation > isn't a vital component of Kwalitee? There's prior art: > > http://cpants.perl.org/hig

Re: Public Humiliation and Kwalitee (was Re: Tested File-Find-Object-0.1.1 with Class::Accessor not installed)

2008-10-23 Thread Andy Lester
On Oct 23, 2008, at 12:37 PM, chromatic wrote: I don't care about backchannel communication between other authors and CPAN Testers, but how can you blame Shlomi for thinking that public humiliation isn't a vital component of Kwalitee? There's prior art: http://cpants.perl.org/highscores/h

Re: Tested File-Find-Object-0.1.1 with Class::Accessor not installed

2008-10-23 Thread Ovid
--- On Thu, 23/10/08, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have tested File-Find-Object without installing its > Class::Accessor > pre-requisite: > > Here is a list of prerequisites you specified and versions > we > managed to load: > > Module Na

Tested File-Find-Object-0.1.1 with Class::Accessor not installed

2008-10-23 Thread Shlomi Fish
Hi Chris! These reports: * http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2008/10/msg2472650.html * http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2008/10/msg2473253.html Have tested File-Find-Object without installing its Class::Accessor pre-requisite: # at t/01ffo.t line 9. #