On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 08:41:13PM +, Fergal Daly wrote:
> package MyModule::OKSwapper;
>
> require Test::More;
> require Exporter;
> @ISA = qw( Exporter);
> @EXPORT= qw( ok );
>
> sub ok
> {
> @_ = 1;
> goto &Test::More::ok;
> }
>
> Then, when you fix all the ok()s in a file, ju
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Tuesday 03 February 2004 19:08, Adrian Howard wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 3, 2004, at 05:44 pm, Tels wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > This has prevented me from "converting" several huge old testsuites
> > from
> > "use Test;" to "use Test::More;" because I kno
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 12:46, Tels wrote:
> I still think a big warning should be added to Test::More beeing _not_ a
> drop-in replacement to Test.
I can only remember calling it a drop-in replacement for Test::Simple.
-- c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Tuesday 03 February 2004 21:41, Fergal Daly wrote:
> > If I could just change "Test;" to "Test::More;" without hundreds of
> > warnings springing on me I know I would convert the test scripts and
> > then change them step by step over to the new code (o
> If I could just change "Test;" to "Test::More;" without hundreds of warnings
> springing on me I know I would convert the test scripts and then change
> them step by step over to the new code (or not change them at all, because
> don't change working code..)
If you don't mind adding a
use My
On Tuesday 03 February 2004 20:46, Tels wrote:
> PS: Thanx for your suggestion, but what exactly does this do:
>
> sub ok
> {
> @_ = 1;
> goto &Test::More::ok;
> }
>
> Pass a single (1), or only the first argument? *puzzled*
It passes a single (1) :-( It should be
$#_ = 0;
I go
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Tuesday 03 February 2004 19:26, Andy Lester wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 06:44:04PM +0100, Tels ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > is there a re reason that the following warns:
> >
> > % perl -MTest::More -le 'plan tests => 1; ok (1,1)'
> > 1.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 06:44:04PM +0100, Tels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> is there a re reason that the following warns:
>
> % perl -MTest::More -le 'plan tests => 1; ok (1,1)'
> 1..1
> # You named your test '1'. You shouldn't use numbers for your test
>names.
>
On Tuesday, February 3, 2004, at 05:44 pm, Tels wrote:
[snip]
This has prevented me from "converting" several huge old testsuites
from
"use Test;" to "use Test::More;" because I know that I would then have
to
go and add testnames to thousand of tests (e.g. all tests that test for
number output).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
is there a re reason that the following warns:
% perl -MTest::More -le 'plan tests => 1; ok (1,1)'
1..1
# You named your test '1'. You shouldn't use numbers for your test
names.
# Very confusing.
and this
10 matches
Mail list logo
