Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 06:13:24AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
> > Hey, I was in that talk and I definitely wasn't yelling 'Sir, yes, sir!'
>
> You'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes.
But I thought you were the running dog l
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 06:13:24AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
> Hey, I was in that talk and I definitely wasn't yelling 'Sir, yes, sir!'
You'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes.
--
Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Perl6 Quality A
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 09:47:26PM -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > http://www.bad-managers.com/rumours/story019.shtml
>
> Don't put bad ideas into my head like that. You obviously didn't hear
> about me getting the whole YAPC::Europe audience
http://www.bad-managers.com/rumours/story019.shtml
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 11:12:36AM -0400, Kurt D. Starsinic wrote:
> I'm glad you're looking out for Kwalitee, and I have observation about
> the RFC's you've offered. None of them have milestones or completion
> states.
You're right, I've totally forgotten about time! Perhaps its because
I
Mike,
I'm glad you're looking out for Kwalitee, and I have observation about
the RFC's you've offered. None of them have milestones or completion
states.
I think that QC in Perl is very important, and has historically lacked
the commitment that you're bringing to it, but I'd like to sug
