On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Michael G Schwern schw...@pobox.comwrote:
Jim Cromie wrote:
What's notable in its absence is any *real* use of perl-dist's tests.
I dug into the code, and found that this works.
$ HARNESS_TIMER=1 make test
Jim Cromie wrote:
What's notable in its absence is any *real* use of perl-dist's tests.
I dug into the code, and found that this works.
$ HARNESS_TIMER=1 make test
ext/threads/t/end.ok 60 ms
I was pondering a perl-core todo-item
=head2 A decent benchmark
Cperlbench seems impervious to any recent changes made to the perl core. It
would be useful to have a reasonable general benchmarking suite that roughly
represented what current perl programs do, and measurably reported whether
