On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:26:46AM +0200, nadim khemir wrote:
> Same for me. I simply didn't understand what the original mail meant. Not at
> all!
Apologies. There were some (dumb) typos that I didn't see when I
re-read the email, and I didn't do a very good job of illustrating what
the problem
* Ovid [2010-04-02 10:05]:
> It's an art to write a concise email which describes a problem.
> What I often find myself doing is writing a long email and then
> summarising at the bottom. When that's done, I often
> cut-n-paste the summary at the top of the email and only leave
> the rest if it is
--- On Fri, 2/4/10, Erik Osheim wrote:
> From: Erik Osheim
> > I assume either
> some code builds it
> > and others then need it or it's expensive to
> build? If it's the
> > former, it implies an ordering dependency and coupling
> in your tests
> > which greatly lowers their utility.
>
> It'
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 12:03:13AM -0700, Ovid wrote:
> I see no one's answered this yet. I was hoping for more clarification
> lest my (mis)understanding hampers things. You have a large data
> structure to share across tests and I assume either some code builds it
> and others than need it or it
--- On Fri, 2/4/10, nadim khemir wrote:
> From: nadim khemir
> Same for me. I simply didn't understand what the original
> mail meant. Not at
> all!
It's an art to write a concise email which describes a problem. What I often
find myself doing is writing a long email and then summarising at
> I see no one's answered this yet. I was hoping for more clarification lest
my (mis)understanding hampers things. You have a large data structure to
share across tests and I assume either some code builds it and others than
need it or it's expensive to build? If it's the former, it implies an
--- On Wed, 31/3/10, Erik Osheim wrote:
> From: Erik Osheim
> So at $WORK we have a bunch of really
> large data (immutable) data
> structures which a ton of our source code uses. As such,
> most tests
> that we write need to access these data structures to run.
> These
> structures can't (curr
So at $WORK we have a bunch of really large data (immutable) data
structures which a ton of our source code uses. As such, most tests
that we write need to access these data structures to run. These
structures can't (currently) be serialized with Storable due to having
LibXML objects in them (among
