On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 01:19:02PM -1000, Tim Jenness wrote:
> I think the skip() function should at least add "Skip" to the reason when
> printing it - the user of Test.pm should not need to know the format of a
> skip message required by Test::Harness.
This has already been fixed (with concessi
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 10:34:18PM +0100, Paul Johnson wrote:
> If we're allowed to mess with the interface, my counter proposal would
> be to simplify it rather than complicate or extend it.
Concurrent evolution is a beautiful thing. I just wrote Test::Simple
last night after a conversation wit
Here is the docs for Test::Simple, an extremely basic, extremely easy
to learn testing module for those just learning to write tests. It
addresses the issue of getting people to write tests *at all*. Forget
about todos and skips and halting problems. Those will be addressed
in a different modul
Looking again at those docs, the example needs to be much simpler.
All the OO parts need to be eliminated, as people often get frightened
when they see OO.
Also, it probably needs more description before we dive into ok().
Test::Simple doesn't require you declare your number of tests. This
is a
So someone on FWP brought up using B::Deparse to display the contents
of subroutine references. This, plus the fact that I found myself
needing multi-line assertions drove me to write this new function for
Carp::Assert.
I'm looking for comments before I release this in the new version.
=item
