testing File::Finder

2003-12-18 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
In my recently released File::Finder module, I have the basic tests to ensure that the find options are grabbed correctly, and that the core and/or/not/parens logic is clean, along with the easy test to ensure that eval() works. However, to test the file operations, like "files named moe", I have

Re: testing File::Finder

2003-12-18 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 01:28:57PM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > In my recently released File::Finder module, I have the basic > tests to ensure that the find options are grabbed correctly, > and that the core and/or/not/parens logic is clean, along with > the easy test to ensure that eval() w

Re: testing File::Finder

2003-12-18 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Michael" == Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Michael> If you're not planning on your tests modifying the test tree at all, Michael> you can probably just get away with having t/tree/... as a bunch of Michael> normal files and directorys in the tarball. Don't ship a seperate Mi

Re: testing File::Finder

2003-12-18 Thread Abe Timmerman
Op een winterige herfstdag (Thursday 18 December 2003 22:44), schreef Randal L. Schwartz: > > "Michael" == Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Michael> If you're not planning on your tests modifying the test tree at > all, Michael> you can probably just get away with having t/tr

[ANNOUNCE] Devel::Cover 0.29

2003-12-18 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 01:45:22AM +0100, Paul Johnson wrote: People seem to be using this module. I keep getting bug reports, suggestions and even patches ;-) Changes in this release: - Merge data from files with identical MD5 checksums (Arthur Bergman). - Add do test. - Handle $x || return