Using Ken's ExtUtils::CBuilder, wrapped in an eval block in case it barfs,
I've added a utility function to MakeMaker::Test::Utils to check if there
is a compiler suitable for XS builds. You can see this used in t/xs.t in
the repository.
http://svn.schwern.org/svn/CPAN/ExtUtils-MakeMaker/trunk/t/x
On 14.Feb.2005 09:01PM -0800, chromatic wrote:
> Here's my list of suggestions for each:
>
> 1) label, description
> 2) directive, instruction
> 3) diagnostic
>
> I want to avoid the word "comment" altogether, making the
> optionalness of #1 and #3 evident in their words, the
> activeness of #2
darcs [1] is slow in a few places, and I'm working on benchmarking tool
in Perl to help monitor the performance. I'm got some questions about
the best way to proceed.
1. http://www.darcs.net/
So far: I've divided the task into a couple specific problems:
A. What repos to use for testing?
B. A
On 30.Nov.2004 09:57AM -0600, Andy Lester wrote:
>plan tests => 14, have( "Foo::Wango" ), moon_phase eq "waning", etc;
Where does the reason fit into this syntax?
--
Ian Langworth
Project Guerrilla
Northeastern University
College of Computer and Information Science
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 11:02:45PM +, Mark Stosberg wrote:
> My solution?
>
> my $out = `time $bin diff 1/1 2>&1`;
>
># XXX Parsing of time output may be fragile
>$out =~ m/\s*([\d\.]*\s+real.*)/;
>
> Ouch.
>
> Perhaps my whole approach is wrong. Am I overlooking a good open sou
Ian Langworth wrote:
> On 30.Nov.2004 09:57AM -0600, Andy Lester wrote:
>
>
>> plan tests => 14, have( "Foo::Wango" ), moon_phase eq "waning", etc;
>
>
> Where does the reason fit into this syntax?
well, this syntax doesn't exist in Test::More at the moment (though I
probably should get ar
On 12.Mar.2005 11:41PM -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> nevertheless, what you are replying to was just a discussion
> about a feature that doesn't exist in the standard Test::More
> toolkit but was brought up because Apache-Test's plan() works
> a bit differently and there are enough people who lik
