Re: Regression Behaviour between (correction!)

--- Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can anyone else comment on this? I understand exactly where Shlomi > is > coming from and I know that he's wrong in his thoughts, but there is > certainly a difference of opinion regarding 'correct' behavior. I meant "and I *DON'T* know that he's wrong in hi

Re: Regression Behaviour between TAPx-Parser-0.41 to TAPx-Parser-trunk

On Friday 16 February 2007, Ovid wrote: > Can anyone else comment on this? I understand exactly where Shlomi is > coming from and I know that he's wrong in his thoughts, but there is > certainly a difference of opinion regarding 'correct' behavior. > Actually, I wasn't claiming the current behavi

Re: Test::Simple API incompatibility - cpan-testers FAIL results

Nicholas Clark wrote: On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 09:17:00AM +1100, Adam Kennedy wrote: Because the other alternative would be "Doing a Schwern" and I I'm sure you'd prefer to preserve that term for something positive :) Such as herding MakeMaker for years with no-one ever saying thanks. I offer

Integrating Test::Run into an ExtUtils::MakeMaker+Test::Manifest Setup - Take 2

Hi all! In regards to: http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qa/2006/11/msg7395.html I applied Schwern's input into the Makefile.PL process of XML::RSS: http://svn.perl.org/modules/XML-RSS/trunk/Makefile.PL Enjoy! Regards, Shlomi Fish -- --

RE: Fixtures

--- Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Later, the 'Our::Test::Database' has a DESTROY method which drops the > database. At the beginning and end of every .t file, the database is > created from scratch and destroyed. I forgot to mention something very important if you use this technique. We cac

Re: Integrating Test::Run into an ExtUtils::MakeMaker+Test::Manifest Setup - Take 2

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://svn.perl.org/modules/XML-RSS/trunk/Makefile.PL You have: -- { package MY; sub test_via_harness { my($self, $perl, $tests) = @_; return qq|\t$perl "-MTest::Manifest" | .