Re: Auto: Your message 'FAIL IO-AIO-2.51 i386-freebsd-thread-multi 6.2-release' has NOT been received

2007-12-21 Thread Chris Dolan
On Dec 20, 2007, at 12:19 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote: On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Andy Armstrong wrote: His view: cpan-testers are incompetent, ego tripping, quasi- religious nuisances. I think there's some truth to this view. For support I submit this bug ticket - http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/ Display.h

Re: Auto: Your message 'FAIL IO-AIO-2.51 i386-freebsd-thread-multi 6.2-release' has NOT been received

2007-12-21 Thread David Golden
On Dec 20, 2007 6:07 PM, Michael Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I for one would like the full TAP output of the tests. Not just what get's > sent > to STDOUT by default. What would be ideal (and it's something that RJBS has > poked me about before) would be to receive a TAP Archive (prove --a

Re: Proc::Fork on Windows

2007-12-21 Thread Christopher H. Laco
A. Pagaltzis wrote: > * David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-19 17:30]: >> It looks like it does (as long as you remove the "-T" from the >> shebang in 01.real.t. > > Anyone with Windows who cares to, please bang on > http://plasmasturm.org/attic/Proc-Fork-0.5.tar.gz > before I send it to the

Re: Proc::Fork on Windows

2007-12-21 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-19 17:30]: > It looks like it does (as long as you remove the "-T" from the > shebang in 01.real.t. Anyone with Windows who cares to, please bang on http://plasmasturm.org/attic/Proc-Fork-0.5.tar.gz before I send it to the CPAN. Thanks again for trackin

Re: Proc::Fork on Windows

2007-12-21 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Christopher H. Laco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-21 18:40]: > All tests pass: Strawberry Perl 5.8.8/XP Thanks Chris. On its way. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis //

Re: Auto: Your message 'FAIL IO-AIO-2.51 i386-freebsd-thread-multi 6.2-release' has NOT been received

2007-12-21 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, David Golden wrote: On Dec 20, 2007 1:19 PM, Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's generally pretty rare that the failure report includes enough information for me to do anything about it, so without an engaged party on the other end, it really is just noise. With C

Re: Auto: Your message 'FAIL IO-AIO-2.51 i386-freebsd-thread-multi 6.2-release' has NOT been received

2007-12-21 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Ovid wrote: To summarize what I think Imacat's point is: some CPAN testers quite deliberately have only core modules installed in order to catch issues just like this. As a result, anything which assumes a non-core module (like your Makefile.PL previously assuming Module::

Re: Proc::Fork on Windows

2007-12-21 Thread David Golden
On Dec 21, 2007 12:32 PM, A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone with Windows who cares to, please bang on > http://plasmasturm.org/attic/Proc-Fork-0.5.tar.gz > before I send it to the CPAN. Passes on Strawberry Perl 5.10.0 beta 2 as well. David