Re: Untested libraries update

2001-09-20 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 04:35:04PM -0700, Zach Lipton wrote: > I don't know why this didn't occur to me before, but why not put this in a > Wiki? That's a great idea! And by some shocking coincidence, we just happen to have a perl-qa Wiki for you to add this to. :) http://www.pobox.com/~schwer

Re: Untested libraries update

2001-09-20 Thread Zach Lipton
I don't know why this didn't occur to me before, but why not put this in a Wiki? It seems to be a _huge_ pain to mail this list out every few weeks whenever something changes, why not post it up and allow people to mark it up a little: say that they are working on a test so the effort isn't duplic

CPAN::Smoke (was Re: Test::Harness::Straps)

2001-09-20 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 02:52:20PM -0400, Shane Landrum wrote: > My cursory look at CPAN::Smoke says that it's sort of what I want. > Except that I don't want to have to rely on having a CPAN mirror Look at CPAN::Smoke::Module and CPAN::Smoke::Author to set up modules without a CPAN index. > I

Re: Test::Harness::Straps

2001-09-20 Thread Shane Landrum
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 11:56:57AM -0400, Michael G Schwern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Ok, I'll have to trap STDERR. It's going to be tricky to preserve the > interweaving of STDOUT and STDERR though, and to do it without > IPC::Open3. Thanks. In the meantime, I'll see what I can do as a us

RE: Test::Harness::Straps

2001-09-20 Thread Richard Soderberg
From: Kirrily Robert [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > In perl.qa, Schwern wrote: > > Hmmm, more people trying it, really, especially on the weird > > platforms. I rewrote all the test analysis logic and I > > still afraid I broke something. > We're probably going to start using it for e-smith's testing fo

Re: Test::Harness::Straps

2001-09-20 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 12:17:08PM -0400, Kirrily Robert wrote: > We're probably going to start using it for e-smith's testing foo. > I've dinked around with it briefly, enough to know that it does roughly > what I want, but I'm not on any kind of unusual platform or anything, so > I don't know if

Re: Test::Harness::Straps

2001-09-20 Thread Kirrily Robert
In perl.qa, you wrote: >On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:35:49AM -0400, Shane Landrum wrote: >> So, I've just found Test::Harness::Straps--- thanks to Skud >> for pointing me in the right direction. Anyone else using it? >> I'm working on using it to write a web-based test summarizer >> for my users. >

Re: Test::Harness::Straps

2001-09-20 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 11:30:38AM -0400, Shane Landrum wrote: > I want T::H::Straps to be able to tell me whether there were warnings > during my test run, and if so, what they were. Working modules > don't generally warn. Perhaps that should be switchable. Ok, I'll have to trap STDERR. It's

Re: Test::Harness::Straps

2001-09-20 Thread Shane Landrum
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:58:08AM -0400, Michael G Schwern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Hmmm, more people trying it, really, especially on the weird > platforms. I rewrote all the test analysis logic and I still afraid I > broke something. > > The interface needs to be gelled a bit. Half of

Re: Test::Harness::Straps

2001-09-20 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:35:49AM -0400, Shane Landrum wrote: > So, I've just found Test::Harness::Straps--- thanks to Skud > for pointing me in the right direction. Anyone else using it? > I'm working on using it to write a web-based test summarizer > for my users. > > Schwern, do you have pla

Test::Harness::Straps

2001-09-20 Thread Shane Landrum
So, I've just found Test::Harness::Straps--- thanks to Skud for pointing me in the right direction. Anyone else using it? I'm working on using it to write a web-based test summarizer for my users. Schwern, do you have plans for releasing T::H 2.00 to CPAN as anything other than an alpha? What do

Re: Untested libraries update

2001-09-20 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 04:37:41PM +0100, Paul Marquess wrote: > From: Rafael Garcia-Suarez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Michael G Schwern listed: > > [...] > > > warnings::register (almost no docs) > > Hmm, would a "see L and L." do? I've always been a fan of putting the docs near the code