On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 04:25:02PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 06:25:20PM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > You have been drinking deeply from the fount of the QA Kool-Aid,
> > haven't you? I'm probably not going to be surprised one day to
> > find a regression tes
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jarkko Hietaniemi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> In the process, with some advice from perl-qa, I've added a mock object so
>> the test could control the output of Socket::inet_ntoa() and
>> Socket::inet_aton(). t/lib/Mock/ seemed like as good a place as any.
>
> Net::Config doesn't care *how* inet_ntoa and inet_aton do their job.
> It just cares that it gets data in the right format. Tying STDIN
So why is this tested using a mock-up by Net::Config? Sounds like
a job the Socket should be testing (and it is).
> and feeding fake input to Term::Complete
On Saturday 20 October 2001 11:54, you wrote:
> So why is this tested using a mock-up by Net::Config? Sounds like
> a job the Socket should be testing (and it is).
Oh, no! It's not. Mock::Socket is just a dummy object with the same
interface as Socket. It lets the test control the data sent
In article <20011021000950.I588@blackrider>, "Michael G Schwern"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For libnet it happens to work out that the untestable part (the network
> connection) is incidental. The testable part (the protocol) is essential.
> That's the sweet spot. If we can seperate the net c
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 12:04:49PM -0600, chromatic wrote:
> On Saturday 20 October 2001 11:54, you wrote:
>
> > So why is this tested using a mock-up by Net::Config? Sounds like
> > a job the Socket should be testing (and it is).
>
> Oh, no! It's not. Mock::Socket is just a dummy object with
On 2001.10.20 17:16 Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 02:02:59AM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > >
> > > I think installhtml teeters heavily on the brink of "Rewriting"
> > > instead of "Refactoring". It hasn't changed much since 1997.
> >
> > Refactoring is just rewriting
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 10:42:33PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:07:26AM -0600, chromatic wrote:
> > > - Of those covered, a smidge less than half have < 75% statement coverage. - "
> > >" " , 20% have < 50% statement coverage.
> >
> > Is it possible to ge
Here's a test suite for Net::Config. In the process of writing this, I've
fixed an apparent bug that prevented single values from becoming array
references when necessary. I think it's right, but perhaps Graham should weigh
in on this.
In the process, with some advice from perl-qa, I've added a
> Here's a test suite for Net::Config. In the process of writing
> this, I've fixed an apparent bug that prevented single values from
> becoming array references when necessary. I think it's right, but
> perhaps Graham should weigh in on this.
>
> In the process, with some advice from perl-qa, I
When looking at something that's going to prove nasty to test, you can
apply the same criteria as Holmes: Once we remove the untestable, what
remains, however difficult, must be testable.
What's the problem with testing libnet? The network connection. We
can't guarantee that the machine will ha
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 02:02:59AM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 08:58:11AM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > > Once you've done that you can add "Refactoring" to the list of
> > > buzzwords on your resume. :)
> >
> > I think installhtml teeters heavily on the brink
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 06:25:20PM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> You have been drinking deeply from the fount of the QA Kool-Aid,
> haven't you? I'm probably not going to be surprised one day to
> find a regression test for Configure waiting in my inbox.
Would you mind it if you did? ;)
--
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 01:54:14AM -0600, chromatic wrote:
> In article <20011020014825.J3681@blackrider>, "Michael G Schwern"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Convert from $opt_* globals to an %Options hash
>
> A fun use of map!
>
> Is there a test for this beast? A quick 'perl -wc inst
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Johan Vromans"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure what you are trying to achieve with this.
Really really small incremental changes?
> The net efffect is that you get something like
>
> GetOptions('foo' => \$Options{foo}, 'bar=s' => \$Options{bar}
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 10:37:01PM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
> By the way, I got rid of perl-qa-metrics. It's basically dead, right?
Basically.
--
Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Perl6 Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kwalitee Is Job
> # parse the command-line
> -my $result = GetOptions( qw(
> +my $result = GetOptions( map {
> + my $key = $_;
> + $key =~ s/\W.+$//;
> + $key => \$Options{$_};
> +} qw(
> help
> podpath=s
> podroot=s
I'm not sure what you are trying to a
In article <20011020014825.J3681@blackrider>, "Michael G Schwern"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Convert from $opt_* globals to an %Options hash
A fun use of map!
Is there a test for this beast? A quick 'perl -wc installhtml' verified that
it compiles, but refactoring's half complete without
18 matches
Mail list logo
