I'm implementing is_cmp() inside Test::Builder and I figured it would
be nice if is_eq, is_num, isnt_eq and isnt_num all just went through
that. And thus Test::More's is() and isnt().
This would mean is($got, $expect) becomes is_cmp($got, 'eq', $expect)
and isnt() becomes is_cmp($got, 'ne', $exp
Authors of Test modules, listen up.
I've never quite properly described the purpose of Test::Builder.
Mostly its come off as a way to tweak Test::More's behavior a little
or to implement your own Test::More-ish library.
It does that, but that's not what's really neat. And I only just
realized t
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 10:53:28PM -0500, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
> > Oooh, pretty. Beats the hell out of is_deeply.
>
> Only for "table" structured data. Since older Data::Dumpers don't sort
> hash keys, and I haven't integrated the Data::Dumper like code I have
> elsewhere, it isn't gener
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 08:54:51PM -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 04:38:20PM -0500, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
> > I've written a Test::Differences[1] that outputs things like:
> >
> > not ok 5
> > # Failed test 5 in blib/lib/Test/Differences.pm at line 221 fail #4
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 04:38:20PM -0500, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
> I've written a Test::Differences[1] that outputs things like:
>
> not ok 5
> # Failed test 5 in blib/lib/Test/Differences.pm at line 221 fail #4 *TODO*
> # +-+--+
> # | Got | Expected |
> # +-+
I've written a Test::Differences[1] that outputs things like:
not ok 5
# Failed test 5 in blib/lib/Test/Differences.pm at line 221 fail #4 *TODO*
# +-+--+
# | Got | Expected |
# +-+--+
# | a\n | a\n |
# >x* b\n <
# | c\n | c\n
