So...
In a previous thread I was talking about how eq_set() should be really
called eq_bag(). Now, not that I've got too much on my plate already (see
my fun todo) but I do have an itch to scratch...
I'm fed up applying too much logic in my test suites. This is bad
because:
a) I spend
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 03:26:21PM +0100, Mark Fowler wrote:
There's a lot of other problems like that. So I was thinking of writing
Test::Sloppy (aka Test::Fuzzy, aka...)
What would it do?
(I can show you lots of sloppy tests if you like. :)
--
Michael G. Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 03:26:21PM +0100, Mark Fowler wrote:
There's a lot of other problems like that. So I was thinking of writing
Test::Sloppy (aka Test::Fuzzy, aka...)
What would it do?
(I can show you lots of sloppy tests if you like.
On Tue 09 Apr 2002 18:02, Mark Fowler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 03:26:21PM +0100, Mark Fowler wrote:
There's a lot of other problems like that. So I was thinking of writing
Test::Sloppy (aka Test::Fuzzy, aka...)
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:02:32PM +0100, Mark Fowler wrote:
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 03:26:21PM +0100, Mark Fowler wrote:
There's a lot of other problems like that. So I was thinking of writing
Test::Sloppy (aka Test::Fuzzy, aka...)
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:05:49PM +0100, Adrian Howard wrote:
Hi all,
I've been refactoring a bunch of old tests with Test::More and some
convenience routines for testing exceptions dropped out (along with some
class base testing and mock object modules which still need cleaning up into
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Mark Fowler wrote:
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Michael G Schwern wrote:
What would it do?
(I can show you lots of sloppy tests if you like. :)
Sorry, maybe it wasn't clear from the example. sort of like eq_set meets
is_deeply.
Well, I think he was just being a bit of a
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:24:32AM +0900, Curt Sampson wrote:
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Adrian Howard wrote:
lives_ok BLOCK TEST_NAME
Tests to see that BLOCK exits normally, and doesn't die.
I'm not sure exactly what the purpose of this is; your test will
still fail if it dies
