Re: Test::Class - comments wanted

2002-10-14 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:01:10PM -0700, David Wheeler wrote: On Sunday, October 13, 2002, at 10:05 AM, Tony Bowden wrote: Makes it simpler for people who prefer the 'no_plan' style of testing Maybe this is what I just don't get. I'm not one of those people, so I don't really

Re: Test::Class - comments wanted

2002-10-14 Thread chromatic
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 14:46:38 -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote: OTOH, my thinking recently is that the explicit plan has become obsolescent. [1] The explicit plan protects against: 1. Your test dying. 2. Your test not printing tests to STDOUT 3. Exiting early via exit(). #1 and #2 are

Some upcoming changes to Test::Builder

2002-10-14 Thread Michael G Schwern
I'm working on Test::Builder 0.48 and here's some relatively major changes I'm putting in. Some advance warning and a chance for folks to convince me otherwise. * Test::Harness will no longer be optional. Currently, the tests do not require a Test::Harness upgrade. They simply skip over