Testing across forked processes

2002-11-22 Thread Philippe 'BooK' Bruhat
that good (when no test fails): Failed 1/5 test scripts, 80.00% okay. 0/29 subtests failed, 100.00% okay. Not that great. So I guess I'll have to go the IPC way, after all. Any advice or success story? -- Philippe "BooK" Bruhat Even the worst guesser is right once in a while

Re: WWW::Mechanize 0.37 released

2003-03-06 Thread Philippe 'BooK' Bruhat
ther webservers. They can be skipped if the test script detects that for some reason the web "does not work". (Oops, I seem to remember this is in version 0.08, which is not out yet. You can fetch a repository snapshot from http://http-proxy.mongueurs.net/ Have a look at t/22http.t and t

Re: WWW::Mechanize 0.37 released

2003-03-06 Thread Philippe 'BooK' Bruhat
-06 18:22:04.0 +0100 @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ use warnings; use strict; use Test::More tests => 9; +use t::Utils; BEGIN { use_ok( 'WWW::Mechanize' ); @@ -9,6 +10,9 @@ my $t = WWW::Mechanize->new; isa_ok( $t, 'WWW::Mechanize', 'Created object' ); +SKIP: { +skip "Web does not seem to work", 7 unless web_ok(); + ok( $t->get("http://www.google.com/intl/en/";)->is_success, "Got Google" ); is(scalar @{$t->{page_stack}}, 0, "Page stack starts empty"); $t->_push_page_stack(); @@ -21,3 +25,4 @@ is(scalar @{$t->{page_stack}}, 0, "Popped item from page stack"); $t->_pop_page_stack(); is(scalar @{$t->{page_stack}}, 0, "Can't pop beyond end of page stack"); +} -- Philippe "BooK" Bruhat When you wander near evil, Security is only a function of foolishness... (Moral from Groo The Wanderer #21 (Epic))