On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 05:54:15PM +1000, Ken Williams wrote:
> Oh, one big lib/, not several different ones? So then why can't it be
> run with
>
> perl -Mblib=lib t/foo/bar.t
>
> ?
Because tests all try to run from t/. That's what the chdir 't' is for.
t/TEST does this for you and so do t
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 05:54:15PM +1000, Ken Williams wrote:
>> Oh, one big lib/, not several different ones? So then why can't it be
>> run with
>>
>> perl -Mblib=lib t/foo/bar.t
>>
>> ?
blib was invented to allow just such usage.
>
>Because
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 11:57:16AM +0100, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
> Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 05:54:15PM +1000, Ken Williams wrote:
> >> Oh, one big lib/, not several different ones? So then why can't it be
> >> run with
> >>
> >> perl -Mblib=lib
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 11:57:16AM +0100, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
>> Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 05:54:15PM +1000, Ken Williams wrote:
>> >> Oh, one big lib/, not several different ones? So then why can't
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:13:06AM +0100, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
> I understand all that. My point was that while test itself may care
> where it is run, blib.pm does not mind as much. Also blib.pm's job
> is to make running an un-installed module "easy" which is what you
> want to do for a pr
On Tuesday, September 3, 2002, at 08:56 AM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:13:06AM +0100, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
>> I understand all that. My point was that while test itself may care
>> where it is run, blib.pm does not mind as much. Also blib.pm's job
>> is to make runn
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 11:26:01AM +1000, Ken Williams wrote:
> >>Thus is you need to be in t this might suit
> >>
> >> cd t; perl -Mblib=lib foo/bar.t
>
> I'd be happier if that 'cd t;' happened inside blib.pm as 'chdir "t"'.
It already happens inside TestInit.
> I'd be happier still if test
On Tuesday, September 3, 2002, at 03:10 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 11:26:01AM +1000, Ken Williams wrote:
Thus is you need to be in t this might suit
cd t; perl -Mblib=lib foo/bar.t
>>
>> I'd be happier if that 'cd t;' happened inside blib.pm as 'chdir
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 03:34:39PM +1000, Ken Williams wrote:
> >I thought the whole idea was to run blib.pm to set @INC. If
> >the test suite
> >is setting up @INC we don't need blib.
>
> blib.pm only adds to @INC. Seems like the core requires
> something to strip @INC down to a small set, n
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 03:56:14PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> While the result is still ugly, it means we can expand and alter the
> requirements for running a core test. For example, the PERL_CORE
> environment variable should be set (t/TestInit.pm currently doesn't). So
> the full comma
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>There's a chicken/egg problem here. blib.pm is going to find the lib/
>directory so we can load uninstalled modules. So... how do you find
>blib.pm?
Same place one would have found TestInit.pm ?
But I take you point. blib.pm is in perl core dist
11 matches
Mail list logo
