Test::Builder::Tester

2002-02-04 Thread Mark Fowler
Please excuse the roughness of this module, but get feedback early is what they say. For now, I've thrown it up at http://2shortplanks.com/temp/tbt And I'll let the start of the pod speak for itself: NAME Test::Builder::Tester - test testsuites that have been built

Re: Test::Builder::Tester

2002-02-04 Thread Michael G Schwern
speak for itself: > > NAME >Test::Builder::Tester - test testsuites that have been >built with Test::Builder > > SYNOPSIS >use Test::Builder::Tester tests => 1; >use Test::More; > >test_out("not ok

Re: Test::Builder::Tester

2002-02-04 Thread Mark Fowler
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Michael G Schwern wrote: > Mark Fowler wrote: > > 3. Um, licencing of borrowed code (see AUTHOR) > > Take whatever you like. In fact, if you don't mind, I'd like to > distribute this with Test::Builder/More/Simple so I can use it to test > all that. Thanks. Yeah, distribut

Re: Test::Builder::Tester

2002-02-04 Thread Michael G Schwern
H... I thought about the no_ending() problem and basically you need to be able to access the internal list of test results and muck with it to erase the results of the captured tests. I'll put something in for that. -- Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://www.pobox.com/~schw

Re: Test::Builder::Tester

2002-02-10 Thread Mark Fowler
ibute it with Test::Builder then we don't need to do that (as we know they have a capable T::B) Speaking of that, I was wondering if you're going to distribute Test::Builder::Tester with Test::Builder, then it might make more sense that you take over maintenance of the module from tha

Re: Test::Builder::Tester

2002-02-10 Thread Michael G Schwern
ave installed and frob the internal list if we can, > otherwise just default to calling no_ending. Of course, if you distribute > it with Test::Builder then we don't need to do that (as we know they have > a capable T::B) > > Speaking of that, I was wondering if you're g