Re: Test::Builder: Multiple test libraries in one test.

2001-12-19 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 02:07:56PM -0500, Kirrily Robert wrote: > Actually, Test::Mail doesn't work like that. It's more or less a > wrapper around Test::More that handles incoming email. Doesn't > implement any of its own ok()-like routines at all, just makes it easy > to use Test::More's routi

Re: Test::Builder: Multiple test libraries in one test.

2001-12-19 Thread Kirrily Robert
In perl.qa, you wrote: >Candidates for this sort of thing would be CGI::Test, Test::Cmd, >Test::Unit, Test::Mail and ExtUtils::TBone. And, of course, Barrie's >Test::Differences. Actually, Test::Mail doesn't work like that. It's more or less a wrapper around Test::More that handles incoming ema

Test::Builder: Multiple test libraries in one test.

2001-12-12 Thread Michael G Schwern
Authors of Test modules, listen up. I've never quite properly described the purpose of Test::Builder. Mostly its come off as a way to tweak Test::More's behavior a little or to implement your own Test::More-ish library. It does that, but that's not what's really neat. And I only just realized t