On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 05:30:21PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > t/op/numconvert.t Yes (I don't understand the warning at the top)
>
> Which warning would that be?
Would you believe "# Repent for the end is near?"
I have no idea what I was talking about.
> I think it's more likely to
Am I being goofy if I want to fix the stuff that I know is bad even if
it can't be done via an ok() function? I seem to recall that the
print "not " unless something;
print "ok xx\n";
occurs a lot and make VMS all urpy.
I'll look into cleaning that up after doing the ok() insetions. It's
p
Michael G Schwern wrote:
>t/op/flip.t Yes (what is this?)
>
Flip-flop operator, I think.
I'll keep plugging, and thanks for the help.
--- Joe M.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 05:17:57PM -0400, Joe McMahon wrote:
> Am I being goofy if I want to fix the stuff that I know is bad even if
> it can't be done via an ok() function? I seem to recall that the
> print "not " unless something;
> print "ok xx\n";
>
> occurs a lot and make VMS all urpy.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 09:25:23PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> If I'm right, this is the format test, ain't it? If so, be
> *extremely* careful with the last part (60 lines or so), cause it
> depends on the way the IO handles are dealt with (nested write's)
Hmmm... you're messing with STDOUT.
On Thu 30 Aug 2001 20:46, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, quick run-through of what in t/op it's safe to use Test::More
> with. 'Yes' means use Test::More. 'No' means use an 'ok' function.
> 'No way' means you can't even use an 'ok' function.
>
> This is just a quick, cursory
Ok, quick run-through of what in t/op it's safe to use Test::More
with. 'Yes' means use Test::More. 'No' means use an 'ok' function.
'No way' means you can't even use an 'ok' function.
This is just a quick, cursory overview. Scream if something looks wrong.
t/op/64bitint.t Yes
t/op/an
