Re[2]: Are GB 18030 and CNS 11643-1992 the best spellings?

2002-03-30 Thread Anton Tagunov
Hello, Jungshik! 1) GB 18030, CNS 11643-1992 JS> I guess the official designation is GB 18030-2000. JS> I believe they'reCNS 11643-1992 or CNS 11643-1986. Ken's online has the later one CNS 11643-1992 (the reason I asked you, Junghik, was I was not sure if Ken's online has t

[Encode] "\x{df}" is NOT UTF-8 (Was: [Re: Encode anomalies ...)

2002-03-30 Thread Dan Kogai
On Saturday, March 30, 2002, at 04:57 , Andreas J. Koenig wrote: > All the warnings below seem bogus to me. > > % /usr/local/perl-5.7.3@15620/bin/perl -wle ' > use Encode qw(from_to); > $x = "\x{df}"; > from_to($x,"utf-8","iso8859-1"); > ' > Use of uninitialized value in su

Re: [Encode] "\x{df}" is NOT UTF-8 (Was: [Re: Encode anomalies ...)

2002-03-30 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 18:39:37 +0900, Dan Kogai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Saturday, March 30, 2002, at 04:57 , Andreas J. Koenig wrote: >> All the warnings below seem bogus to me. >> >> % /usr/local/perl-5.7.3@15620/bin/perl -wle ' >> use Encode qw(from_to); >> $x = "\x{df}"; >>

Re: [Encode] Charset-0.01 released

2002-03-30 Thread Nick Ing-Simmons
Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >And then you'll ahve to disambiguate between that and encoding.pm... >Why aren't we extending encoding.pm instead? That was my thought as well - that there is overlap with Jarkko's work use encoding. -- Nick Ing-Simmons http://www.ni-s.u-net.com/

[Encode] encoding vs. Charset

2002-03-30 Thread Dan Kogai
On Saturday, March 30, 2002, at 08:00 , Nick Ing-Simmons wrote: > Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> And then you'll ahve to disambiguate between that and encoding.pm... >> Why aren't we extending encoding.pm instead? > > That was my thought as well - that there is overlap with Jarkko

Re: [Encode] encoding vs. Charset

2002-03-30 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
Feel free to to adopt encoding.pm as a part of Encode and further develop it. -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen

[Encode] *.ucm relocated; Encode/ -> ucm/

2002-03-30 Thread Dan Kogai
Autrijus, On Saturday, March 30, 2002, at 07:20 , Autrijus Tang wrote: > On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 07:07:34AM +0900, Dan Kogai wrote: > > mm. In a sense, .ucm files is like .c files -- it can contain comments > and even embedded documentations (CWEB, heh), but in the end of day > it's the .so and ma

Re: [Encode] encoding vs. Charset

2002-03-30 Thread Dan Kogai
On Sunday, March 31, 2002, at 12:46 , Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > Feel free to to adopt encoding.pm as a part of Encode and further > develop it. Okay. I will add it from the next version of Encode. Oh, one more thing. I would like you to copy ext/Encode/bin/enc2xs to utils/enc2xs.PL Com

Re: [Encode] encoding vs. Charset

2002-03-30 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 01:41:25AM +0900, Dan Kogai wrote: > On Sunday, March 31, 2002, at 12:46 , Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > Feel free to to adopt encoding.pm as a part of Encode and further > > develop it. > >Okay. I will add it from the next version of Encode. >Oh, one more thing.

[Encode] should piconv be installed in INST_SCRIPT as well?

2002-03-30 Thread Dan Kogai
On Sunday, March 31, 2002, at 01:52 , Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > I will. How about the piconv? Well, let's take a poll first on this. While this script is not as imperative as enc2xs, It is a part of perl culture to reinvent a better wheel, such as a2p and find2perl. For those of you

[Encode] is there any way to tell the current I/O disciplines ?

2002-03-30 Thread Dan Kogai
NI-S, I am now working on encoding.pm. I wrote a more elaborate version of jperl.t and the prognosis is bright. Now I am adding I/O control for encoding.pm and found one thing; To make "no encoding" work with I/O control, the old state of line disciplines must be stored somewhere. B