> its preferred MIME name is 'Shift_JIS'. If there is a name marked as
> 'preferred MIME name' by IANA, this name is the recommended one. This
> also meets the W3C guidelines. W3C also recommends to use them all in
> lowercase. Since they are case insensitive, I don't see any advantage
> in not us
Robert Allerstorfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I agree that perl should accept all the IANA names.
>> As for the default names _I_ decided to use MIME name as prefered name
>> when it existed - they seemed to be more "usable" (less embedded or at
>> least more systematic-looking punctuatio
Dear Nick,
On Wed, 09 Oct 2002, 09:35 GMT+01 (10:35 local time) Nick Ing-Simmons
wrote:
> I agree that perl should accept all the IANA names.
> As for the default names _I_ decided to use MIME name as prefered name
> when it existed - they seemed to be more "usable" (less embedded or at
> leas
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 09:13:39AM +0100, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
> >Counter-intuitive it may be, you can pass extra 'tips' to that thingy
> >like
> >
> > my $e = find_encoding('MIME-Header');
> > $e->{charset} = ISO-8859-1; # or $e->charset('ISO-8859-1') if we
> >define a method
> > m
Dear Rob,
> Well, unless I hear requests from Thai native users, I'll abstain since
> TIS620 did not exist in http://www.unicode.org/Public/. So far as I
> see ISO-8859-11 suffices.
FYI. ISO-8859-11 == TIS620 + NBSP
So, perhaps an alias is sufficient?
Martin
Robert Allerstorfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Hi Dan,
>
>> Well, unless I hear requests from Thai native users, I'll abstain since
>> TIS620 did not exist in http://www.unicode.org/Public/. So far as I
>> see ISO-8859-11 suffices.
>>
>> But once again I am only human so correct me if I am wr
Dan Kogai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>On Wednesday, Oct 9, 2002, at 16:15 Asia/Tokyo, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
>> But given that Encode::MIME::Header exists and is "cluttering up" my
>> machine's memory it is a pity it does not do a _little_ more.
>
>
>Patches welcome -- so long as it passes ext/E
Hi Dan,
> Well, unless I hear requests from Thai native users, I'll abstain since
> TIS620 did not exist in http://www.unicode.org/Public/. So far as I
> see ISO-8859-11 suffices.
>
> But once again I am only human so correct me if I am wrong.
>
> Dan the Man with Too Many Encodings to Suppor
On Wednesday, Oct 9, 2002, at 16:15 Asia/Tokyo, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
> But given that Encode::MIME::Header exists and is "cluttering up" my
> machine's memory it is a pity it does not do a _little_ more.
You've got a point. Both Perl::Tk and Encode are huge and user would
not want yet anothe
