Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>And then you'll ahve to disambiguate between that and encoding.pm...
>Why aren't we extending encoding.pm instead?
That was my thought as well - that there is overlap with Jarkko's
work use encoding.
--
Nick Ing-Simmons
http://www.ni-s.u-net.com/
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:49:38AM +0900, Tatsuhiko Miyagawa wrote:
> > I first thought so but the temptation to
> >perl -MCharset=your-encoding -e
> > was too insatiable.
> In this situation, pragma (I mean charset.pm) would be more
> reasonable. Just a thought.
And then you'll ahve to
At Sat, 30 Mar 2002 05:26:59 +0900,
Dan Kogai wrote:
> > Very nice, but shouldn't you name it Filter::Charset to prevent
> > namespace explosion?
>
> I first thought so but the temptation to
>
>perl -MCharset=your-encoding -e
>
> was too insatiable.
In this situation, pragma (I mean
On Saturday, March 30, 2002, at 04:43 , Martin 'Kingpin' Thurn wrote:
> Very nice, but shouldn't you name it Filter::Charset to prevent
> namespace explosion?
I first thought so but the temptation to
perl -MCharset=your-encoding -e
was too insatiable.
Dan the Man with Too Many Topleve
Encode hackers,
With Encode-1.00 released, I felt like a more casual programming so I
came up with Charset-0.01. I'll just post a pod2text-rendered doc to
show you how it is like. My favorite is a one-liner from shell script.
Dan the Yet Another Perl Hacker -- Now in Various Languages
==
