Re[2]: - charset + character set + coded character set + CCS (?) (was: [Encode] Encode::Supported revised)

Hello, Jungshik! http://tagunov.tripod.com/survey2.html is largely an answer, so, if you allow, I will comment with links into this page :) JS> On the other hand, no one with *sufficient understanding* JS> of the issue uses 'character set' to mean encoding. ISO> coded character set; code ISO>

Re: - charset + character set + coded character set + CCS (?) (was:[Encode] Encode::Supported revised)

On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Anton Tagunov wrote: Hi Anton !! AT> Our comments go in the same direction, but will you AT> let me strengthen your statements a bit? Thank you ! JS> On the other hand, no one with *sufficient understanding* JS> of the issue uses 'character set' to mean encoding. AT> [E

Re: - charset + character set + coded character set + CCS (?) (was: [Encode] Encode::Supported revised)

Anton Tagunov wrote on 2002-04-04 11:45 UTC: > [RFC 1345]: > The ISO definition of the term "coded character set" is as Why only quote old secondary literature, if the ISO standards themselves are available online: http://www.evertype.com/sc2wg3.html Markus -- Markus G. Kuhn, Computer Lab

- charset + character set + coded character set + CCS (?) (was: [Encode] Encode::Supported revised)

Hello Jungshik! Our comments go in the same direction, but will you let me strengthen your statements a bit? >> =head1 Encoding vs. Charset JS> Whether you like it or not, 'charset' is overloaded by MIME to mean JS> 'encoding' (Character set Encoding Scheme=CES as defined in RFC 2130). Indeed it