Re: Encode 1.87 and later don't pass make test on static perl

2003-03-07 Thread Blair Zajac
Dan Kogai wrote: > > Sorry, my finger has slipped. > > On Thursday, Mar 6, 2003, at 22:48 Asia/Tokyo, Dan Kogai wrote: > > On Thursday, Mar 6, 2003, at 04:10 Asia/Tokyo, Blair Zajac wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have several self compiled copies of Perl 5.8.0, one of which is > > compiled to be st

Re: Encode 1.87 and later don't pass make test on static perl

2003-03-06 Thread Dan Kogai
Sorry, my finger has slipped. On Thursday, Mar 6, 2003, at 22:48 Asia/Tokyo, Dan Kogai wrote: On Thursday, Mar 6, 2003, at 04:10 Asia/Tokyo, Blair Zajac wrote: Hello, I have several self compiled copies of Perl 5.8.0, one of which is compiled to be statically linked (for Perl modules that is, no

Re: Encode 1.87 and later don't pass make test on static perl

2003-03-06 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
> On Wed, 05 Mar 2003 11:10:54 -0800, Blair Zajac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > If I can find tar.gz's of Encode 1.86 and > 1.87, I could check again to ensure that 1.86 and 1.87 work and fail > respectively. http://mirrors.develooper.com/perl/backpan/authors/id/D/DA/DANKOGAI/ -- andrea

Encode 1.87 and later don't pass make test on static perl

2003-03-05 Thread Blair Zajac
Hello, I have several self compiled copies of Perl 5.8.0, one of which is compiled to be statically linked (for Perl modules that is, not libc and other system libraries) so I can profile the code using gcc -pg. I've been upgrading and compiling Encode successfully with this Perl, but for Encode