Andreas J. Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 23:38:57 +0900, Dan Kogai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Would you send me the application that is causing this?
>
>I've sent you in PM a testcase that exhibits the bug for me.
>
>If anybody else is interested: the sample is
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 09:47:02PM +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 23:38:57 +0900, Dan Kogai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Would you send me the application that is causing this?
>
> I've sent you in PM a testcase that exhibits the bug for me.
>
> If anybody else
> On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 23:38:57 +0900, Dan Kogai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Would you send me the application that is causing this?
I've sent you in PM a testcase that exhibits the bug for me.
If anybody else is interested: the sample is a 65kB text file and a 10
line perl script. If you'r
Andreas,
On Monday, April 1, 2002, at 10:14 , Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> This isn't an April's fool email though I feel as if this perl were an
> April's fool perl.
>
> With todays perl I cannot get the same job done that was working with
> perl@14354. My application (an indexer) runs for a while
