An alternative that I think has been overlooked is sending a combined
format. It is quite easy to do.
If you really want to send HTML for the nice formatting, graphics, etc., the
real size is already there. Adding the plain text generally does not add
much bulk to the message and email clients
byron wise wrote:
>
> Two items:
> 1. Many people have expressed the dislike for HTML formatted email. I know
> people that might use a UNIX based mail client like Pine or something might
> not be able to view the html. And, I do know load time is a factor,
> especially with images. However,
Two items:
1. Many people have expressed the dislike for HTML formatted email. I know
people that might use a UNIX based mail client like Pine or something might
not be able to view the html. And, I do know load time is a factor,
especially with images. However, our users use email clients or
