This is correct for Apache and probably NES too. There are other servers
that do this though. I posed the question to an apache newsgroup and the
answer was that it isn't any less efficient to open and print the file in
perl. I guess convenience isn't high on their list of priorities. What I
ended
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Our web administrator just told me that...
>
> "Web servers don't parse the output of CGI scripts for SSIs."
>
> after I asked her...
>
> "My perl script contains server-side include statements. Will these work
> with a cgi extension?"
>
> Is this true? I would lik
>"Web servers don't parse the output of CGI scripts for SSIs."
>"My perl script contains server-side include statements. Will these work
>
>Is this true? I would like the server-side include statements to be parsed
>after the perl engine parses the script?
Yes, it's true, and nope, you can'
