Question about OLE control of Outlook and attachments

2002-05-10 Thread Norris, Joseph
Group, First of all thanks to all who have written on this subject up until this point. I have learned a lot - but.. I have a problem - actually two. I have the following code: #!c:\perl\bin\perl.exe use Win32::OLE qw( in ); my $path = 'c:\web\html\download\requisition\IT66_0.rtf';

RE: Newbie book

2002-05-10 Thread Ember Normand
When I was learning Perl, I really liked the O'Reilly book: "Learning Perl" (aka the llama book) fits your requirements. It explains from the ground up with lots of exercises. I've used a lot of the O'Reilly Perl books and I've really liked them. Also check out "Programming Perl" (aka the camel

RE: Newbie book

2002-05-10 Thread Aaron Trevena
> Would you please recommend an introductory level book. > I prefer ones with alot of tutorials/projects. > A book of projects would be great. Randal Shwartz's 'Learning Perl' uses plenty of examples and explains perl well Followed by Tom Christiansen / Nathan Torkington 'Perl Cookbook' if you a

RE: Secure platforms DO matter!

2002-05-10 Thread Bellenger, Bruno \(Paris\)
Here is it again, the 'off-topic-thread-that-just-won't-go-away' : -) An interesting post was made yesterday on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list on the subject of M$ and security, under the title "Security Problems Won't Go Away With Microsoft" You can read it on line at : http://onli

Newbie book

2002-05-10 Thread Todd_Hemsell
Would you please recommend an introductory level book. I prefer ones with alot of tutorials/projects. A book of projects would be great. I am fair with VB and Javascript. Thanks for your time, Todd ___ Perl-Win32-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Preferred PERL Editor

2002-05-10 Thread Martin Moss
I find that VIM for windows is my preferred windows editor too:-) > -Original Message- > From: Warkentin, Brad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday 10 May 2002 15:58 > To: 'Martin Moss'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Preferred PERL Editor > > > Martin Moss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: Perl syntax check without using "perl -c"

2002-05-10 Thread Thomas_M
Actually, that didn't work quite like I thought it did. The output was of course going to stderr and wasn't captured by the $output variable. > -Original Message- > From: Thomas_M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:47 AM > To: 'Tillman, James'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

RE: Preferred PERL Editor

2002-05-10 Thread Warkentin, Brad
Martin Moss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ponders: > Doesn't anybody still use VI these days?? :-) vim for quick and dirty (faster launch times), XEmacs for real editing bj ___ Perl-Win32-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: http://listse

RE: GetTcpTable API?

2002-05-10 Thread Krummel, James C - PGGC-6
Scott, You are right. The port value is the upper of two big-endian shorts. The second short is not used. My goof. James 'Reading the documentation is ALWAYS the cowards last resort..' use strict; use Win32::API; my $api = new Win32::API("iphlpapi.dll", "GetTcpTable", ['P','P','N'], 'N')

RE: Preferred PERL Editor

2002-05-10 Thread Tillman, James
> Doesn't anybody still use VI these days?? :-) > Strangely enough, I use vim for system admin tasks and Xemacs for coding. Talk about a schizo! Vim almost always installed on *nix and easy to get for Win32 via CygWin so having "vim reflexes" at the command line is handy, but I like Xemacs's

RE: Perl syntax check without using "perl -c"

2002-05-10 Thread Thomas_M
> Oops, sorry, I should have specified that I don't want the > perl code to actually run in any context, especially that of > my own program. I just want the syntax checked as in "perl -c". $code = q($a=5; print a++); $output = `perl -ce $code`; # output: # syntax error at -e line 1, near "++

RE: Preferred PERL Editor

2002-05-10 Thread Martin Moss
Doesn't anybody still use VI these days?? :-) Marty > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Tillman, James > Sent: Friday 10 May 2002 15:37 > To: 'Warkentin, Brad'; 'Lee Goddard'; Aaron Trevena; Simon Oliver > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subj

RE: Preferred PERL Editor

2002-05-10 Thread Tillman, James
> It's not an editor... its a lifestyle... though in the spirit of full > disclosure, now that OS's have GUIs I do wander out of Emacs > to do some > stuff. Not to start YET ANOTHER RELIGIOUS WAR (YARW), but XEmacs does quite nicely on both Linux and Win32. So you can have your GUI and your EMA

RE: Preferred PERL Editor

2002-05-10 Thread Warkentin, Brad
Lee Goddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Okay, where do I get Xemacs? > Only kdding - getting it now... Welcome to the one true editor... :-) It's not an editor... its a lifestyle... though in the spirit of full disclosure, now that OS's have GUIs I do wander out of Emacs to do some stu

RE: Preferred PERL Editor

2002-05-10 Thread Lee Goddard
Okay, where do I get Xemacs? Only kdding - getting it now... ___ Perl-Win32-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs

RE: Why my boss doesn't want Perl...

2002-05-10 Thread Lee Goddard
At 08:58 10/05/2002 -0400, Tillman, James wrote: >Certainly, but I'll wager there are very, very, very few VB-only programmers >who deserve the label of "hacker" ;-) Hacker in the sense of hacking together bits of other people's stuff and calling it Art... or their own. As in newspaper reporte

RE: Preferred PERL Editor

2002-05-10 Thread Aaron Trevena
re: emacs > > >Also, no blinking bracket matching, doesn't understand qq{}, qw//, etc. > > > > What is blinking bracket matching? > Xemacs blinks the matching bracket when your on the other match. Xemacs also has other nifty features such as warning you of unmatched heredoc, brackets and incompl

RE: Perl syntax check without using "perl -c"

2002-05-10 Thread Tillman, James
> Try: > > eval $perl_code; > print $@ if $@; > > instead of the check_syntax call. It worked with this simple > one-liner: > > perl -e "$code='$answer=';eval $code; print $@ if $@;" Oops, sorry, I should have specified that I don't want the perl code to actually run in any contex

Re: Perl syntax check without using "perl -c"

2002-05-10 Thread Simon Oliver
"Joseph P. Discenza" wrote: > > Tillman, James wrote, on Friday, May 10, 2002 9:03 AM > : Does anyone know of an easy way to syntax-check the contents of a Perl > : variable as if it were Perl code? I want to avoid running "perl > : -c" from my > : program, primarily because I'll have to use a t

Re: Preferred PERL Editor

2002-05-10 Thread Simon Oliver
Lee Goddard wrote: > > >Also, no blinking bracket matching, doesn't understand qq{}, qw//, etc. > > What is blinking bracket matching? Xemacs blinks the matching bracket when your on the other match. > It can find the next bracket fo the set if you use CTRL+M: > holding down SHIFT at the same t

RE: Perl syntax check without using "perl -c"

2002-05-10 Thread Joseph P. Discenza
Tillman, James wrote, on Friday, May 10, 2002 9:03 AM : Does anyone know of an easy way to syntax-check the contents of a Perl : variable as if it were Perl code? I want to avoid running "perl : -c" from my : program, primarily because I'll have to use a temporary file for : the output : (or th

Perl syntax check without using "perl -c"

2002-05-10 Thread Tillman, James
Does anyone know of an easy way to syntax-check the contents of a Perl variable as if it were Perl code? I want to avoid running "perl -c" from my program, primarily because I'll have to use a temporary file for the output (or the input, depending). What I want is something like this: #

RE: Why my boss doesn't want Perl...

2002-05-10 Thread Tillman, James
> Biggest problem I can find with Perl is that it is free, and > relatively easy. Agreed! > I suppose there are a lot of hackers who give Perl Hackers a > bad name, but isn't that the case with VB and C++? Certainly, but I'll wager there are very, very, very few VB-only programmers who deserv

RE: Why my boss doesn't want Perl...

2002-05-10 Thread Lee Goddard
At 06:52 10/05/2002 -0400, Tillman, James wrote: >Anyway, I hope all this helps. For what it's worth, my employer doesn't >promote the use of Perl either, despite the fact that I use it daily in >project management tasks to save hours of time and I have put together a >completely functional Cont