Re: Comparisons was [4]: Release of ActivePerl 5.8.0 - released today

2002-11-11 Thread Jan Dubois
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:41:47 +1100, "Sisyphus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >In the end, I downloaded build 626 built by AS and compared its performance >to the 626 that I built, by running that script that I posted the other day. > >626 built by AS took 2.94 seconds. >626 built by me took 4.64 seco

Comparisons was [4]: Release of ActivePerl 5.8.0 - released today

2002-11-11 Thread Sisyphus
- Original Message - From: "Sisyphus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jan Dubois" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:55 AM Subject: Re: Re[4]: Release of ActivePerl 5.8.0 - released today > > - Original Message - > From: "Jan Dubois" <[EMAIL P

win32::ole format ?

2002-11-11 Thread lance
I am trying to format an Excel cell. Everything works but the HorizontalAlignment. VBA Macro gives:       Range("D3").Select    With Selection    .HorizontalAlignment = xlCenter    .VerticalAlignment = xlBottom    .WrapText = False    .Orientation = 0    .AddIndent =

RE: change IP address

2002-11-11 Thread John Serink
Even though NT tells you to reboot after changing the IP when using the network control panel appet, the address in fact does change without a reboot. Experiment with stopping and starting some services to find out which one will reload the network info from the registry. > -Original Messag

Re: Re[2]: Release of ActivePerl 5.8.0 - released today

2002-11-11 Thread Jack
- Original Message - From: "Jan Dubois" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 1:26 PM Subject: Re: Re[2]: Release of ActivePerl 5.8.0 - released today > I haven't followed the Tk 804 discussion; did Nick > indicate it w

Re: Re[4]: Release of ActivePerl 5.8.0 - released today

2002-11-11 Thread Sisyphus
- Original Message - From: "Jan Dubois" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Are you sure you used the same compilation options? Especially, did you > set all 3 of USE_MULTI, USE_ITHREADS and USE_IMP_SYS? > Yes, I accepted the 'BUILD_FLAVOR=ActivePerl' option which sets USE_MULTI and USE_ITHREADS. 'P

Re: Re[2]: Release of ActivePerl 5.8.0 - released today

2002-11-11 Thread Jan Dubois
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 22:31:53 -0600 (CST), Randy Kobes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I was wondering about the 5.8 repository at >http://www.activestate.com/ppmpackages/5.8-windows/ - it doesn't >seem to include packages that need a C compiler, like DBI. Is it >just too early for these, or is there a

Re: Re[2]: Release of ActivePerl 5.8.0 - released today

2002-11-11 Thread Jan Dubois
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 13:13:30 -0700, "Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> No, it is not. Tk is already included in ActivePerl 802, so there is no >> need to install it from the repository. > >Before I download and install - can you tell me which version of Tk this is? > >I assume 800.024 - or hav

Re: Re[2]: Release of ActivePerl 5.8.0 - released today

2002-11-11 Thread Jack
- Original Message - From: "Jan Dubois" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:19 PM Subject: Re: Re[2]: Release of ActivePerl 5.8.0 - released today > > > >Do you know whether Tk is a victim of this ? > > No, it is not. Tk

Re: Re[4]: Release of ActivePerl 5.8.0 - released today

2002-11-11 Thread Jan Dubois
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 14:13:34 +1100, "Sisyphus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Yes, because gcc 2.95.2 is really a worse compiler compared to VC++ 6. It >> runs a lot slower, but more importantly, the code it generates is also >> about 20% slower than the code that VC++ generates. > >This is not wh

Re: Re[2]: Release of ActivePerl 5.8.0 - released today

2002-11-11 Thread Jan Dubois
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 10:21:12 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On 10/11/2002 04:54:57 Jan Dubois wrote: > >>Yes, the current repository is just the result of the first automated run >>for ActivePerl 8xx. We already noticed that even some of the modules that >>always used to pass are still missing.

RE: web form editor

2002-11-11 Thread Joseph Youngquist
Found what I was talking about. placing that in an html file will add a richedit control 6.0 to the page. Burak Gürsoy's e-mail is what your looking for though. JY -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:perl-win32-users-admin@;listserv.ActiveState.com]On Behalf Of George

Re: web form editor

2002-11-11 Thread steve silvers
I know what your talking about. Cold Fusion does this really nicely with a bold and underline, italics, ect interface... But I don't think that perl has a module to do this. If your looking to send "html" email use the Mime::Lite module. From: George Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTE

RE: web form editor

2002-11-11 Thread Joseph Youngquist
If it's a richedit control, then I would have to assume that there is an activeX thingy running it in IE. I'm almost 100% sure that this is not an html element. Check the win32::Ole::Browser (for some reason it's not willing to run on my box at the moment). I was playing around about 6 months ago

RE: web form editor

2002-11-11 Thread Burak Gürsoy
http://webfx.eae.net/dhtml/richedit/richedit.html no module needed I believe... evething happens on the client side... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:perl-win32-users-admin@;listserv.ActiveState.com]On Behalf Of George Harris Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 8:31 PM To:

Re: web form editor

2002-11-11 Thread George Harris
2nd try: Does anybody know how these inline editors are created into a web page form, and if there are any perl modules to support this? Thanks. --- George Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I do all of my CGI form handling in perl. > > But I've noticed that there is a way to put