It's not a Perl Thing. All languages (including Java, .Net) cannot
'eval' javascript. Since you can access the javascript file, why not
mimick their encryption?
Hon Shi wrote:
Been all over news, just want to verify with the pros here.
lwp and javascript don't play. I have a login page uses a
Been all over news, just want to verify with the pros here.
lwp and javascript don't play. I have a login page uses a javascript
function to encrypt the login. There's nothing I can do.
I'm dead .. right?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Ma
Hon Shi wrote:
> New to pipes - got one working - but now want to set it up
> so the forked process won't block. I thought I'd try and use
> IO::Selects's ->can_read(1) method. I've tried it many different
> ways. What am I doing wrong? Here is my simple script.
I believe select only works o
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:49:39PM -0800, Hon Shi wrote:
> New to pipes - got one working - but now want to set it up
> so the forked process won't block. I thought I'd try and use
> IO::Selects's ->can_read(1) method. I've tried it many different
> ways. What am I doing wrong?
Under Windows
New to pipes - got one working - but now want to set it up
so the forked process won't block. I thought I'd try and use
IO::Selects's ->can_read(1) method. I've tried it many different
ways. What am I doing wrong? Here is my simple script.
use IO::Select;
my $s = IO::Select->new();
pipe READ
$Bill Luebkert wrote:
Dial, Joe wrote:
Hi,
When I read the first post, I remembered seeing that somewhere before.
Then, I was amazed to see the "this is not what the range operator was
meant to do."
So, I looked for it. Found it in chapter 6 of the Perl Cookbook. Its
Recipe 6.8.
See this UR
Paul Sobey wrote:
> Jim Hill wrote:
>
> > Instead of running all day with a cmd shell with system account
> > privileges, I think it would be safer if only the scripts which
> > need such privileges are able to obtain them at runtime
>
> Have you considered psexec (http://www.sysinternals.com) -
mark pryor wrote:
> Foo Ji-Haw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jim Hill wrote:
> > > mark pryor wrote:
> > >
> > > > You can use the WinXP schtasks utility to run a script
> > > > in the SYSTEM account.
> >
> > > I can't, I'm afraid. I'm running win2k with no plans to change.
> >
> > There is a Per
$Bill Luebkert in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jim Hill wrote:
> > mark pryor wrote:
> > > Jim Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > [...] is there a better, safer way
> > > > of gaining system account status within a perl script?
> > >
> > > You can use the WinXP schtasks utility to run a script
$Bill Luebkert wrote:
Dial, Joe wrote:
Hi,
When I read the first post, I remembered seeing that somewhere before.
Then, I was amazed to see the "this is not what the range operator was
meant to do."
So, I looked for it. Found it in chapter 6 of the Perl Cookbook. Its
Recipe 6.8.
See this UR
I'm trying to debug a slow memory leak in a service I have written to
monitor performance counters on my servers. The service queries several
wmi every 5 seconds, and exhibits a very slow leak, such that processes
grow to a 100MB in size after a few weeks.
I think I have pinned down the leak to th
> Instead of running all day with a cmd shell with system account
> privileges, I think it would be safer if only the scripts which
> need such privileges are able to obtain them at runtime for
> themselves.
>
> Unfortunately, I have no idea how to go about that.
Have you considered psexec (http
Foo Ji-Haw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You can use the WinXP schtasks utility to run a script>> in the SYSTEM account.>> >> I can't, I'm afraid. I'm running win2k with no plans to change.> There is a Perl library that can automate the Windows scheduler, for both 2000 and 2003.hello, http:/
13 matches
Mail list logo
