- Original Message -
From: "Sisyphus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "perl-win32-users"
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 1:41 PM
Subject: [OT] patch.exe on Vista is unusable.
> Does anyone have a working patch.exe on Vista ?
There's actually nothing wrong with the patch.exe files.
The probl
- Original Message -
From: "Sisyphus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "perl-win32-users"
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 1:41 PM
Subject: [OT] patch.exe on Vista is unusable.
.
.
> Does anyone have a working patch.exe on Vista ?
There's actually nothing wrong with the patch.exe files.
The p
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Ellery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'perl-win32-users'"
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 5:24 AM
Subject: NET SSH2 ppm for 5.10
> does anyone know of a source for a NET::SSH2 ppm for 5.10? I managed to
> get this from uwinnipeg for 5.8, but ppm is te
Hi,
Well ... it's some perl source that I'm wanting to be able to patch.
(But,yeah ... I know ... that doesn't count :-)
Does anyone have a working patch.exe on Vista ?
At every attempt I make to run 'patch' from the cmd.exe command line I'm
prompted for admin password and, having provided that
does anyone know of a source for a NET::SSH2 ppm for 5.10? I managed to
get this from uwinnipeg for 5.8, but ppm is telling me it can't find it
in the 5.10 repository (now that I've upgraded).
Thanks,
Mike Ellery
___
Perl-Win32-Users mailing list
Perl-
Thanks everybody. I opted for vim and plain debugger in my XP. Works great for
me;)
Regards & Thanks Prabir Senapati mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- On Tue, 9/23/08, Mary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Mary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: info on Perl IDE and debugger in WindowsXP
>
Welcome to the world of software development! "It worked fine for years on
XYZ.." is
something I've heard so often with software that contains hidden bugs that were
never found,
often because of poor initial design. :-(
"perl -w" and "use warnings;" are your friends!
Here was my first run, wi
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Dennis Daupert wrote:
>
> I ran across this bit in one of Randall Schwartz's articles. He talks
> about at least one of those File::Find limitations (which may have
> been fixed by now, I haven't looked lately.)
You may also want to take a look at File::Next:
http://searc
Kenneth Ölwing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, sorry if I steal your thunder :-), but have you looked at
File::Find?
Hi Ken1,
Yes, indeed, I have used File::Find in the past, but ran into some
limitations.
That's why I was quite excited to hear MJD give a talk on Higher Order Perl
at.
the NA YA
Hmm, sorry if I steal your thunder :-), but have you looked at File::Find?
And the ton of extras for variations, like File::Find::Object, ::Wanted,
::Closures, ::Rule, ::Parallel, ::Node etc etc etc...I would be
surprised if you didn't find (no pun intended ;-) something useful in
that bunch.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Wagner) wrote:
> I would put some print statements in there to verify that the
> variables contain what u think they contain.
Hi Chris, thanks for your reply.
Yes, I had lots of prints in my original code; I snipped those out
to make my post briefer.
> Another thing I no
Dennis wrote:
>> The script has a problem when it hits a directory or filename containing
>> spaces.
"Sisyphus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Probably best if you could provide a small standalone
> script (or one liner) that we can all run, and that
> demonstrates the problem.
Once I've created a
12 matches
Mail list logo
