Re: Thoritical limits on perl processes

2003-08-21 Thread Michael D. Smith
>Seeing as there are about 10^85 atoms in the universe More realistically the number that can be addressed by 64 bits. It must be 64, you're already over the amount that can be addressed by 32 bits (something just over 2 billion). 64 bits will address some exponent number that you won't have to

Re: Thoritical limits on perl processes

2003-08-18 Thread Ted S.
On 18 Aug 2003, Subrahmanyam Vadlamani wrote in perl: > Suppose I want to read in large text files and want to > do something with them. Are there any theoritical > limits on the process size of a perl script? Seeing as there are about 10^85 atoms in the universe, I don't think you could have a

Re: [Perl-unix-users] Thoritical limits on perl processes

2003-08-18 Thread Martin Moss
Title: RE: [Perl-unix-users] Thoritical limits on perl processes Hi,   You may also want to ask yourself whether reading the whole file into memory rather than processing it line by line is a good idea if the file size is large. This all depends on what you are doing with the file's con

Re: Thoritical limits on perl processes

2003-08-18 Thread Carl Jolley
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Subrahmanyam Vadlamani wrote: > Hi: > > Suppose I want to read in large text files and want to > do something with them. Are there any theoritical > limits on the process size of a perl script? > > My scripts are going to be running on an AIX 5.1 > machine with quite a bit of

Thoritical limits on perl processes

2003-08-18 Thread Subrahmanyam Vadlamani
Hi: Suppose I want to read in large text files and want to do something with them. Are there any theoritical limits on the process size of a perl script? My scripts are going to be running on an AIX 5.1 machine with quite a bit of RAM (about 8 GB RAM). I will be using perl 5.6.0. thanks for th