Re: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-08 Thread Chris Wagner
At 07:00 PM 10/8/05 -0400, Bernard Kenik wrote: >> * Reload docs in your browser > >This is the part I do not understand!!! >How? from Where?? to Where?? She just means reopen the index page. Or hit refresh if u already ahve it open. U've got it all right. -- REMEMBER THE WORLD TRADE CENTE

Re: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-08 Thread Bernard Kenik
: "'Chris Wagner'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 3:29 PM Subject: RE: regenerating AS perl html docs as well to make sure we are made aware of it. Stuff on the mailing lists easily gets lost when everyone is too busy. I'll try to write up

Re: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-07 Thread Chris Wagner
At 06:06 PM 10/7/05 -0700, $Bill Luebkert wrote: >> I'll even "Me too" Bill's opinion, but I think it is irrelevant. DHTML >> is not a M$-only feature of a browser. >1) It's not in all popular browsers yet. Strictly speaking, it is. All the way back to Netscape 4.0 there was some DHTML support.

Re: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-07 Thread $Bill Luebkert
Richard A. Wells wrote: > $Bill Luebkert wrote: > >> I'm against exploring any M$-only features of a browser - just doesn't >> make any sense since people that use Perl are much less likely to use >> M$ software over freeware (ie: they're smarter than your average user). >> > Agreed. And neither

Re: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-07 Thread $Bill Luebkert
Glenn Linderman wrote: > > I'll even "Me too" Bill's opinion, but I think it is irrelevant. DHTML > is not a M$-only feature of a browser. 1) It's not in all popular browsers yet. 2) We're not just talking DHTML here - we're talking anything that is peculiar to M$ mostly/only (that's for all f

RE: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-07 Thread Chris Wagner
Thanks, that did it. But I'm still perturbed that that new TOC was even put out there as "the way". Is it so much to even give us an option At 12:29 PM 10/7/05 -0700, Jan Dubois wrote: >but here is a quick workaround to get the old style help back: > >* Delete (or rename) the Perl/html/displ

Re: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-07 Thread Chris Wagner
At 11:59 AM 10/7/05 -0700, Jeff Griffiths wrote: >All the docs are also available online ins a very static format: >http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/docs/ASPNTOC-ACTIVEPERL/ >These should be viewable even if you're still using IE 3 or something. Thanks but that's a workaround not a solution. Why

Re: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-07 Thread Richard A. Wells
$Bill Luebkert wrote: Richard A. Wells wrote: Chris Wagner wrote: Now I see what happened. Somebody at ActiveState thought they would be cute by replacing the old TOC with a DHTML expansion menu. [...] I, too, preferred the old way, esp. since I could browser-search the TOC t

Re: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-07 Thread David . Wright
To: perl-win32-users@listserv.ActiveState.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: eState.com Subject: Re: regenerat

Re: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-07 Thread $Bill Luebkert
Jan Dubois wrote: > > There is nothing Microsoft specific in the ActivePerl docs except > for the PerlScript samples and the OLE browser. They have no > choice as their purpose is to show off the PerlScript functionality > which is an ActiveX scripting engine thingie. See that you keep it that w

RE: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-07 Thread Jan Dubois
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005, $Bill Luebkert wrote: > I'm against exploring any M$-only features of a browser - just > doesn't make any sense since people that use Perl are much less > likely to use M$ software over freeware (ie: they're smarter than > your average user). There is nothing Microsoft specifi

RE: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-07 Thread Peter Guzis
*Doh* What Jan Said :) *mutters something about timing* -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jan Dubois Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 12:30 PM To: 'Chris Wagner'; perl-win32-users@listserv.ActiveState.com Subject: RE: regenerating AS

RE: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-07 Thread Peter Guzis
stserv.ActiveState.com Subject: Re: regenerating AS perl html docs Now I see what happened. Somebody at ActiveState thought they would be cute by replacing the old TOC with a DHTML expansion menu. Well let me tell ya, it was not a good idea. I use Netscape 4.8 and the entire user guide does no

Re: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-07 Thread $Bill Luebkert
Richard A. Wells wrote: > Chris Wagner wrote: > >> Now I see what happened. Somebody at ActiveState thought they would be cute >> by replacing the old TOC with a DHTML expansion menu. [...] >> > I, too, preferred the old way, esp. since I could browser-search the TOC > to find a module by substr

RE: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-07 Thread Jan Dubois
On Fri, 07 Oct 2005, Chris Wagner wrote: Hi Chris, > This is crap. If I don't hear from somebody at ActiveState about > a remedy for this soon I'll have no choice except to go back to > build 811. I guess no more upgrades for me. ActiveState only > wants to do buisness with "cool", "hip", "with i

Re: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-07 Thread Craig Cardimon
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 1:42 PM To: perl-win32-users@listserv.ActiveState.com Subject: Re: regenerating AS perl html docs Now I see what happened. Somebody at ActiveState thought they would be cute by

Re: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-07 Thread Jeff Griffiths
Hi Chris All the docs are also available online ins a very static format: http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/docs/ASPNTOC-ACTIVEPERL/ These should be viewable even if you're still using IE 3 or something. Chris Wagner wrote: If I don't hear from somebody at ActiveState about a remedy for this

RE: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-07 Thread Zeltov Alex
I agree, I have Firefox and I am running into the similar issues. I hate the new TOC. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 1:42 PM To: perl-win32-users@listserv.ActiveState.com Subject: Re: regenerating AS perl html docs

Re: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-07 Thread Richard A. Wells
Chris Wagner wrote: Now I see what happened. Somebody at ActiveState thought they would be cute by replacing the old TOC with a DHTML expansion menu. [...] I, too, preferred the old way, esp. since I could browser-search the TOC to find a module by substring. At least an expand all/clear all

Re: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-07 Thread Chris Wagner
Now I see what happened. Somebody at ActiveState thought they would be cute by replacing the old TOC with a DHTML expansion menu. Well let me tell ya, it was not a good idea. I use Netscape 4.8 and the entire user guide does not work. No warning, no change notes, no options to leave it be. It

RE: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-07 Thread Hicks, Bob
> -Original Message- > Does anybody know how to manually regenerate the html documentation in the > ActiveState perl tree? This is what I got from AS itself: perl -MActivePerl::DocTools -eUpdateHTML(1) There are known issues with IE but thankfully I use Firefox. HTH, Robert ___

Re: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-07 Thread Steve Dawson
Chris Wagner wrote: Does anybody know how to manually regenerate the html documentation in the ActiveState perl tree? I had the same problem when I upgraded. I found a technote on the ActiveState site about the way java ran under IE. It recommended switching to Mozilla. It runs like a dream

RE: regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-07 Thread Rahul Chauhan
PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 9:25 AM To: perl-win32-users@listserv.ActiveState.com Subject: regenerating AS perl html docs Does anybody know how to manually regenerate the html documentation in the ActiveState perl tree? I just upgraded to build 813 and

regenerating AS perl html docs

2005-10-06 Thread Chris Wagner
Does anybody know how to manually regenerate the html documentation in the ActiveState perl tree? I just upgraded to build 813 and now the index pages are gone. I tried reinstalling and installing some packages but nothing recreated it. -- REMEMBER THE WORLD TRADE CENTER ---=< WTC 91