Re: Converting long longs to SVs

2005-05-29 Thread Torsten Schoenfeld
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 11:38 +1000, Sisyphus wrote: > > is there any way to reliably convert long longs (64bit integers) to SVs > > (and back) on 32bit platforms without losing information, and without > > compiling with -Duse64bitint? Both, IV and NV don't seem to provide > > enough room to store

Re: Converting long longs to SVs

2005-05-26 Thread Nick Ing-Simmons
Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:00:35PM +0200, Torsten Schoenfeld wrote: >> Aloha, >> >> is there any way to reliably convert long longs (64bit integers) to SVs >> (and back) on 32bit platforms without losing information, and without >> compiling with -Duse64

Re: Converting long longs to SVs

2005-05-25 Thread Sisyphus
- Original Message - From: "Torsten Schoenfeld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 7:00 AM Subject: Converting long longs to SVs > Aloha, > > is there any way to reliably convert long longs (64bit integers) to SVs > (and back) on 32

Re: Converting long longs to SVs

2005-05-25 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:00:35PM +0200, Torsten Schoenfeld wrote: > Aloha, > > is there any way to reliably convert long longs (64bit integers) to SVs > (and back) on 32bit platforms without losing information, and without > compiling with -Duse64bitint? Both, IV and NV don't seem to provide >

Converting long longs to SVs

2005-05-24 Thread Torsten Schoenfeld
Aloha, is there any way to reliably convert long longs (64bit integers) to SVs (and back) on 32bit platforms without losing information, and without compiling with -Duse64bitint? Both, IV and NV don't seem to provide enough room to store large values. -- Thanks for any pointers, -Torsten