On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 11:38 +1000, Sisyphus wrote:
> > is there any way to reliably convert long longs (64bit integers) to SVs
> > (and back) on 32bit platforms without losing information, and without
> > compiling with -Duse64bitint? Both, IV and NV don't seem to provide
> > enough room to store
Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:00:35PM +0200, Torsten Schoenfeld wrote:
>> Aloha,
>>
>> is there any way to reliably convert long longs (64bit integers) to SVs
>> (and back) on 32bit platforms without losing information, and without
>> compiling with -Duse64
- Original Message -
From: "Torsten Schoenfeld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 7:00 AM
Subject: Converting long longs to SVs
> Aloha,
>
> is there any way to reliably convert long longs (64bit integers) to SVs
> (and back) on 32
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:00:35PM +0200, Torsten Schoenfeld wrote:
> Aloha,
>
> is there any way to reliably convert long longs (64bit integers) to SVs
> (and back) on 32bit platforms without losing information, and without
> compiling with -Duse64bitint? Both, IV and NV don't seem to provide
>
Aloha,
is there any way to reliably convert long longs (64bit integers) to SVs
(and back) on 32bit platforms without losing information, and without
compiling with -Duse64bitint? Both, IV and NV don't seem to provide
enough room to store large values.
--
Thanks for any pointers,
-Torsten