Re: NACO Normalization and Text::Normalize

2003-08-27 Thread Ed Summers
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:15:25AM -0300, Brian Cassidy wrote: > * normalize() > > inputs: either a MARC::Record object or a string. This should probably > accept an arbitrary number of inputs so, you can do > > my @normrecs = normalize( @records ); > > rather than > > my @normrecs; > foreach m

Dedicated Linux Servers

2003-08-27 Thread Greg Lambert/Amigos
Good Morning, I hope this isn't too far off topic. Has anyone looked into using a remote dedicated Linux server rather than installing and maintaining one locally? I've seen dedicated servers from $99.00/mth and up We are looking at our options of using Linux/Apache/PERL/PHP/Python/MySQL on

RE: NACO Normalization and Text::Normalize

2003-08-27 Thread Houghton,Andrew
From: Brian Cassidy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: NACO Normalization and Text::Normalize > * normalize() > > inputs: either a MARC::Record object or a string. This should probably > accept an arbitrary number of inputs so, you can do > * compare() > > inputs: either two M::R objects or t

RE: NACO Normalization and Text::Normalize

2003-08-27 Thread Brian Cassidy
Hi Ed, > I think this is a great idea. At first I was thinking that it would be > nice to be able to pass your normalize() function a MARC::Record object, > which would magically normalize all the relevant fields (like a good > cataloger). This could be a subclass MARC::Record::NACO which adds