Change 21537 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2003/10/25 23:05:21
Integrate:
[ 21536]
show the rehash flags in dumps
Affected files ...
... //depot/maint-5.8/perl/dump.c#24 integrate
Differences ...
//depot/maint-5.8/perl/dump.c#24 (text)
Index: perl/dump.c
--- perl/du
Change 21535 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2003/10/25 22:32:40
Return 21533 (with modifications) having found the problem
Affected files ...
... //depot/perl/hv.c#144 edit
... //depot/perl/hv.h#46 edit
Differences ...
//depot/perl/hv.c#144 (text)
Index: perl/hv.c
--- perl/hv.c#143~
Change 21536 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2003/10/25 22:33:18
show the rehash flags in dumps
Affected files ...
... //depot/perl/dump.c#146 edit
Differences ...
//depot/perl/dump.c#146 (text)
Index: perl/dump.c
--- perl/dump.c#145~20224~ Sun Jul 27 08:48:20 2003
+++ perl/dump
Change 21534 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2003/10/25 20:46:36
Back out 21533 because it broke Encode's build in really weird ways
Affected files ...
... //depot/perl/hv.c#143 edit
... //depot/perl/hv.h#45 edit
Differences ...
//depot/perl/hv.c#143 (text)
Index: perl/hv.c
--- perl/
Change 21533 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2003/10/25 13:10:21
Plan C rough edge smoothing. Criteria for a hash split is now
the earlier of "more keys than buckets" (the old test) or
linked list too long. Rehash is triggered after a split if the
longest linked list is too
Change 21532 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2003/10/25 10:03:18
Subject: Re: [perl #948] $, untieable?
From: Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 00:02:49 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Plus a small fix to t/TEST to recognize the
