Benjamin Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Jeffrey Friedl wrote:
>>
>> Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> |> Awwkay. How about for a compromise I dilute it to a lexical
>> |> warning (so that you can turn it off If You Know What You Are
>> |> Doing)?
>>
>> I think it's still an o
Applied cleanly in 13746, thanks
--- Original Message ---
From:Jens-Uwe Mager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "H.Merijn Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:Mon, 17 Dec 2001 21:13:47 +0100
Subject: Re: Dynamic Build of Perl 5.6.1 on AIX 4.3.3... using gcc
-
On 2001.12.18 12:07 Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
>
> This fails for Cwd.so as it is in archlib but Cwd.pm is in privlib
> in contrast "normal" XS extensions put their .pm-s in archlib as well.
$ grep Cwd MANIFEST
ext/Cwd/Cwd.xs Cwd extension external subroutines
ext/Cwd/Makefile.PL
At 11:50 PM 12/18/2001 +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > How typical. Java implemented the Unicode standard to a T, Microsoft
>
>At least in one point they sharpened the T a bit too sharp and now
>have to bandage the cuts: \u syntax isn't exactly very extensible
>past 0x.
But nobody co
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 04:57:46PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 11:50 PM 12/18/2001 +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > > How typical. Java implemented the Unicode standard to a T, Microsoft
> >
> >At least in one point they sharpened the T a bit too sharp and now
> >have to bandage the cuts:
