Dan,
I think we're really at the point where I have to ask, "What is it you're
trying to do?" The core build will already have passed a -I line
appropriate, and will augment that for the sub-makefiles. Similarly, the
definition of the $(PERL) variable for the generated Makefile's is a
suitably-
On Friday, March 29, 2002, at 07:07 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think we're really at the point where I have to ask, "What is it
> you're
> trying to do?" The core build will already have passed a -I line
> appropriate, and will augment that for the sub-makefiles. Similarly,
> the
> definit
On 2002.03.29 00:15 Mark-Jason Dominus wrote:
>
> Why doesn't PL_hints default to having HINT_LOCALIZE_HH set?
>
> The purpose of %^H was to implement new lexically-scoped pragmas. But
> as it stands, it is not useful for that, because in
>
> { use my_new_pragma;
> ...
>
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 06:01:00PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We ain't got no /usr/bin/perl nohow, nowhere. And no other perl
> test does this on line 1, so I presume this is a silly
> oversight.
This should be irrelevant, as the test is not run as ./hints.t but as
/path/to/perl hints.t.
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 01:48:37AM +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> Better but still no Cuban. Log attached.
Ok, I'll get Tru64 setup.
--
Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Perl Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kwalitee Is Job One
I
