Re: [PATCH] ExtUtils::MakeMaker 5.90_01 -> 5.91_02

2002-04-23 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:42:48AM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote: > Big honkin' patch to sync bleadperl up with MakeMaker 5.91_02 (5.91_01 > plus some test adjustments for the core). > > See lib/ExtUtils/Changes for details. > > Note: This patch blows over 16033's patch to basic.t. Sarathy's

[PATCH] ExtUtils::MakeMaker 5.90_01 -> 5.91_02

2002-04-23 Thread Michael G Schwern
Big honkin' patch to sync bleadperl up with MakeMaker 5.91_02 (5.91_01 plus some test adjustments for the core). See lib/ExtUtils/Changes for details. Note: This patch blows over 16033's patch to basic.t. Sarathy's having some trouble with PASTHRU and nmake, but 16033 just hides the problem.

Re: [PATCH] pod/perlhist.pod

2002-04-23 Thread Gurusamy Sarathy
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 18:12:42 +0200, Abigail wrote: >> If you look in the p5p archives, you'll see perl5.004m5t1 is what >> you expect to be known as 5.004_04-m1, but wasn't called that. >> The 5.004m5t1 name is consistent with previous trials like >> 5.004m2t3 etc. Tim changed the naming scheme i

Re: New UTF-8 surprise

2002-04-23 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 18:53:40 +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 12:08:48PM +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: >> I'd say, the s/// is getting it wrong, although in this case it DWIMs. >> It shouldn't dwim here. >> >> Note: the scalar in question

Re: CPAN Spam

2002-04-23 Thread John Peacock
John Peacock wrote: > Who is the keeper of the lists on onion.perl.org? It appears that > someone mined the CPAN pages for e-mail addresses and then added > everyone there to some Spanish list. I don't want to block all of the > email from that host, but now the spam is being autoreplied to b