Re: Package/Distribution version format and sorting

2003-11-23 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 11:30:11AM +, Leon Brocard wrote: I understand this properly, I want to clarify this in the docs and webpages. This should read: Is this right? When I understand this properly, I want to clarify this in the docs and webpages. Simplest way to sum it up: versions

Smoke [5.9.0] 21779 FAIL(c) bsd/os 4.1 (i386/1 cpu)

2003-11-23 Thread kane
Automated smoke report for 5.9.0 patch 21779 on bsd/os - 4.1 (i386/1 cpu) (fixit.xs4all.nl) using version Report by Test::Smoke v1.18.09 (perl 5.00503) [2 hours 18 minutes] O = OK F = Failure(s), extended report at the bottom X = test(s) failed under TEST but not under harness ? = still

Re: Package/Distribution version format and sorting

2003-11-23 Thread John Peacock
Leon Brocard wrote: I'm getting confused about versions and Perl. I'd like your opinion. More specifically, about the format of versions and how I should sort them. It would probably help to know /why/ you are attempting to sort package versions, i.e. is this something for CPANPLUS or some other