Re: ext/Encode/t/perlio on VMS (was Re: perl@16539)

2002-05-21 Thread PPrymmer
Dan the Encode Maintainer wrote: !-ST(0) = &PL_sv_no; !+/* ST(0) = &PL_sv_no; */ !+ST(0) = &PL_sv_yes; ! XSRETURN(1); ! } ! !Even if it works, I do not consider this to be a radical cure. But a !cure nonetheless ! !BTW, what is the most concise way to check the architectur

Re: [PATCH] readdir_r for VMS (was Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc.)

2003-03-24 Thread PPrymmer
Craig Berry wrote: !To really stress test this with multiple threads going after the same !directory stream I'd need an SMP machine to test on, which I don't have. !But I think we are at least somewhat safer than we were before. Can you specify which thread option to configure.com to use? Also: