Re: [PATCH 5.7.1] B::Concise and extra variables

2001-04-13 Thread Paul Johnson
done by calling B passing the addresses of any +callback subroutines. The subroutines are called in the same order as +they are added. Each subroutine is passed four parameters. These are a +reference to a hash, the keys of which are the names of the variables +and the values of which are their values, the op, the level and the +format. + +To define your own variables, simply add them to the hash, or change +existing values if you need to. The level and format are passed in as +references to scalars, but it is unlikely that they will need to be +changed or even used. + +To see the output, call the subroutine returned by B in the +same way as B does. =head1 AUTHOR -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net

AUTOLOAD and PACKAGES

2001-10-19 Thread Paul Johnson
adperl I have still exhibiting the previous behaviour is DEVEL11596, which was built with threads, so something happened between then and now. It's not obvious to me that either the previous or current behaviour is correct. -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net

Re: [ID 20011231.001] bug in perl 5.6.3 ?

2002-01-03 Thread Paul Johnson
e bottom line is that I don't think you have found a bug in perl. If you still think you have, please send us some code that will reproduce it. PS I think Sarathy would be interested in your copy of 5.6.3 ;-) -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net

Re: [perl #18153] Segfault in perl 5.8.0 while running map { ... }

2002-10-30 Thread Paul Johnson
x27; > > I get the following: > > 5.8.0 - segfault > 17914 - segfault > 17974 - segfault > 18020 - fine > 18052 - fine > > So either it's been fixed recently, or Herr Heisenburg is involved. I would suspect bug 17771 fixed by 17998. Funny how the bug numbers and chan

Re: p5p meeting?

2003-07-01 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 02:13:51PM -0400, Kurt Starsinic wrote: > I haven't heard anything about a p5p meeting this year I thought Rafael had that under control. Oh, that wasn't what you meant? ;-) -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net

Re: [perl #24821] enhancement patch for B::Concise

2004-01-07 Thread Paul Johnson
Jim Cromie said: > 3. Tests for above, inc test following pod recipe for using B::Concise > outside O framework. Thanks very much. Presumably I hadn't added any tests because you hadn't added the framework for them yet. Yes, that must be it. -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL

Re: [perl #31875] syntax my @servers = my @zones = my @vnames = (); doesn't work anymore

2004-10-07 Thread Paul Johnson
est upgrading a little further. -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net