Re: [PATCH t/TEST] Understand "ok" with no number

2005-07-11 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 18:41:30 -0700, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1..3 > ok 1 > ok > ok 3 Thanks, applied as change #25114 I also deleted all trailing whitespace, and made indentation whitespace consistent. Even your patch used both tabs and spaces (expanded and unexpanded) inde

[PATCH t/TEST] Understand "ok" with no number

2005-07-11 Thread Michael G Schwern
1..3 ok 1 ok ok 3 This is perfectly valid test output. A bare "ok" without a number is assumed to have the correct number (in this case, 2). Test::Harness understands this, t/TEST does not. Attached is a simple fix to t/TEST to allow it to understand this syntax. The less different between TH a