On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 11:33:01PM -0400, Randy W. Sims wrote:
> >"use base" sucks. It uses horrible heuristics to do its thing and gets
> >things wrong disturbingly often. IMO its much preferable to avoid it.
> >As an example play around with it with multiple packages in a single
> >file, likewise
demerphq wrote:
On 7/14/05, Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rick Delaney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
use strict;
package Foo::Bar;
our @ISA = qw(Foo);
package Foo::Baz;
our @ISA = qw(Foo);
This is where we have "use base" for.
"use base" sucks. It uses horrible
On 7/14/05, Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rick Delaney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > use strict;
> > package Foo::Bar;
> > our @ISA = qw(Foo);
> >
> > package Foo::Baz;
> > our @ISA = qw(Foo);
>
> This is where we have "use base" for.
"use base" sucks. It use
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 12:17:43PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
> I think the "our variable redeclared" warning can be extended to the case
>
> our $x; our $x;
>
> but specifically not to the case
>
> our $x; package X; our $x;
>
> since in this latest case the 2nd $x is bound to
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 12:17:43PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
>
> I think the "our variable redeclared" warning can be extended to the case
>
> our $x; our $x;
>
> but specifically not to the case
>
> our $x; package X; our $x;
>
> since in this latest case the 2nd $x is bound
On 7/13/05, Rick Delaney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree too. The following patch will make the first case warn too.
> Note that it also changes this current behaviour:
>
> % perl -wle 'our $p; package X; our $p;'
> % perl -wle 'our $p; package X; my $p;'
> "my" variable $p masks
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 09:21:50AM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> > "Rick" == Rick Delaney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rick> Whatever, it was just an example. Can we get this bug resolved,
> Rick> please?
>
> By "resolved", you mean "my $x; our $x;" needs masking warning, not
> that the
> "Rick" == Rick Delaney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rick> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:05:26PM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
>>
>> This is where we have "use base" for.
Rick> Whatever, it was just an example. Can we get this bug resolved,
Rick> please?
By "resolved", you mean "my $x; our $x;"
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:05:26PM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
>
> This is where we have "use base" for.
Whatever, it was just an example. Can we get this bug resolved,
please?
--
Rick Delaney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rick Delaney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> use strict;
> package Foo::Bar;
> our @ISA = qw(Foo);
>
> package Foo::Baz;
> our @ISA = qw(Foo);
This is where we have "use base" for.
-- Johan
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 02:01:40PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 02:15:49AM -0400, Rick Delaney wrote:
> > I agree too. The following patch will make the first case warn too.
> > Note that it also changes this current behaviour:
> >
> > % perl -wle 'our $p; package
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 02:15:49AM -0400, Rick Delaney wrote:
> I agree too. The following patch will make the first case warn too.
> Note that it also changes this current behaviour:
>
> % perl -wle 'our $p; package X; our $p;'
> % perl -wle 'our $p; package X; my $p;'
> "my"
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 08:29:58PM -0700, Michael G Schwern via RT wrote:
>
> This is still an issue in 5.9.x. I'd agree, there should be a warning
> particularly because all other combinations issue a warning:
>
> $ bleadperl -lwe 'my $x = 42; our $x = 23; print $x'
> 23
> $ bleadperl -lwe 'my
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Mar 30 21:52:59 2000]:
>
> Shouldn't
>
> perl5.6.0 -we 'my $x; our $x; $x=0'
>
> generate some sort of "redeclared" warning?The other cases
> (two "my"s or two "our"s or "our" before "my") all do.
This is still an issue in 5.9.x. I'd agree, there should be a w
14 matches
Mail list logo
