On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:49:18PM -0800, Peter Prymmer wrote:
> P.S. the bad news is that the need to go hacking into UTF8 eq ops has
> disappeared - at least for now (I know you were looking forward to that
> ;-).
Damn! It's actually all starting to work, isn't it? :)
--
For detailed informat
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Peter Prymmer wrote:
> This one looks very telling:
>
> $ ./perl -le 'printf "%v", $^V'
> %v$
How about if we try that with a "%vd" format and the 8506 perl kit?
$ ./perl -le 'printf "%vd", $^V'
5.7.0$
> > perl -le 'print ord for split //, $^V'
>
> $ ./perl -le 'print
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > > perl -le 'use Devel::Peek; $a = sprintf "%v", $^V; Dump($a)'
> >
> > The last one even in a UNIX tells us:
>
> Uhhh, I should've said: "a variation of the last one", I was using
> sprintf("%vd", v128.256). My perl version isn't v128.256 :-)
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:49:18PM -0800, Peter Prymmer wrote:
> > P.S. the bad news is that the need to go hacking into UTF8 eq ops has
> > disappeared - at least for now (I know you were looking forward to that
> > ;-).
>
> Damn! It's actually all s
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 11:55:38AM -0800, Peter Prymmer wrote:
> $ ./perl -le 'use Devel::Peek; $a = sprintf "%vd", $^V; Dump($a)'
> SV = PV(0x1a8c4034) at 0x1a8cfe4c
> REFCNT = 1
> PV = 0x1a8c7ba8 "5.7.0"\0
Good.
> FLAGS = (POK,pPOK,UTF8)
Bad. But even that doesn't explain why configpm w
