On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 09:58:39AM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> Another alternative would be to rename the thing
> no_compiler, returning undef or an explanation. But I'm not going to
> pursue these alternatives unless someone likes them better.
Hey, I like that.
On Mar 21, 2005, at 11:58 AM, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
An alternative would be to have have_compiler return ($have_compiler,
$errmsg) if wantarray. That makes the code in the caller more clunky
though (IMO). Another alternative would be to rename the thing
no_compiler, returning undef or an
On Mar 21, 2005, at 12:02 PM, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
I'm a client too. I don't use CPAN or CPANPLUS usually to build
things,
I manually check for dependencies.
I dislike it when a module that has dependencies (even just for tests)
doesn't mention them in Makefile, META.yml, or a README o
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 09:55:37AM -0600, Ken Williams wrote:
>
> On Mar 20, 2005, at 2:08 PM, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 12:30:01AM -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> >>On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 10:51:39PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
> >>wrote:
> >>>I was a litt
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 09:57:26AM -0600, Ken Williams wrote:
>
> On Mar 20, 2005, at 4:09 PM, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> >I was thinking along the lines of:
> >
> >
> >if (have_compiler($errmsg)) {
> >plan tests => 1;
> >} else {
> >plan skip_all => $errmsg;
> >}
> >
> >
> >
> >sub
On Mar 20, 2005, at 2:08 PM, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 12:30:01AM -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 10:51:39PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
wrote:
I was a little surprised to see t/xs reporting "No compiler found to
test XS builds", till I saw t
On Mar 20, 2005, at 4:09 PM, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
I was thinking along the lines of:
if (have_compiler($errmsg)) {
plan tests => 1;
} else {
plan skip_all => $errmsg;
}
sub have_compiler {
my $errmsg = "";
...
$_[0] = $errmsg if @_;
return $have_compiler;
}
It would p
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 04:20:21PM -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Nothing critical has been been reported (that hasn't been fixed) in 6.25_11
> so 6.25_12 has just been released. Unless I hear otherwise by Tuesday this
> will become ExtUtils::MakeMaker 6.26.
I put the snapshot inside blead on
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 02:09:22PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> I was thinking along the lines of:
>
> if (have_compiler($errmsg)) {
> plan tests => 1;
> } else {
> plan skip_all => $errmsg;
> }
Patches welcome.
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 01:48:35PM -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 12:06:51PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> > It's really a gray area. cygwin aims at providing a linux-like
> > environment, and when one cygwin program starts another, the args are
> > passed in a
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 01:47:38PM -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 12:08:54PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> > > There is no equivalent in MakeMaker.
> >
> > And you can't hand-alter the META.yml?
>
> Yes but then I would have to turn off the META.yml auto-gen
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 12:06:51PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> It's really a gray area. cygwin aims at providing a linux-like
> environment, and when one cygwin program starts another, the args are
> passed in an actual array; it's just when a non-cygwin program starts
> a cygwin progr
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 12:08:54PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> > There is no equivalent in MakeMaker.
>
> And you can't hand-alter the META.yml?
Yes but then I would have to turn off the META.yml auto-generation for good.
Also ExtUtils::CBuilder is an optional build requirement. It
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 12:30:01AM -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 10:51:39PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> > I was a little surprised to see t/xs reporting "No compiler found to
> > test XS builds", till I saw that it is checking for Extutils::CBuilder.
> > Coul
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 12:24:54AM -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 10:20:59PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> > I encountered a problem with quoting when running a cygwin gcc (in
> > this case, in "-mno-cygwin" MinGW mode) from a non-cygwin make that
> > the follow
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 10:51:39PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> I was a little surprised to see t/xs reporting "No compiler found to
> test XS builds", till I saw that it is checking for Extutils::CBuilder.
> Could that be added to build_recommends (or whatever the appropriate
> tag is)
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 10:20:59PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> I encountered a problem with quoting when running a cygwin gcc (in
> this case, in "-mno-cygwin" MinGW mode) from a non-cygwin make that
> the following patch would fix, but I've been hesitant to send it to
> you because I d
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 04:20:21PM -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Nothing critical has been been reported (that hasn't been fixed) in 6.25_11
> so 6.25_12 has just been released. Unless I hear otherwise by Tuesday this
> will become ExtUtils::MakeMaker 6.26.
>
> Why make such a fuss? Because
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 04:20:21PM -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Nothing critical has been been reported (that hasn't been fixed) in 6.25_11
> so 6.25_12 has just been released. Unless I hear otherwise by Tuesday this
> will become ExtUtils::MakeMaker 6.26.
>
> Why make such a fuss? Because
Nothing critical has been been reported (that hasn't been fixed) in 6.25_11
so 6.25_12 has just been released. Unless I hear otherwise by Tuesday this
will become ExtUtils::MakeMaker 6.26.
Why make such a fuss? Because I'll be offering 6.26 as being stable enough
for 5.8.x, the first new release
20 matches
Mail list logo
